Taking porn from the sliders is, perhaps, the best move for this board. It's always been a favorite weapon of (((theirs))). Qresearch doesn't need lewdness to demotivate. It needs focus, and restraint.
If you came here for tits and CP, then you came to the wrong place to begin with. There are tons of boards/threads absolutely dedicated to that nonsense.
CIA
MOS
I think Q has made it pretty clear who runs them:
https://8ch.net/qresearch/res/2338883.html#2339108
At any rate, I think you get it. When men focus their energy on things related to sex, their intellectual proclivities are hindered. Porn isn't 1st amendment anything. It's a tool of subversiveness disguised as a "right" to expression. It serves no purpose here.
None of this has anything to do with Q. That's the problem you refuse to admit. You're attempting to conflate two completely unrelated things, and your attempts to pass it off as a 1st amendment deal (Like Larry Flynt) simply will not work here.
Take your nonsense to /pol/; see how long it lasts there. It won't, because you already know where your subversive content belongs. Not to mention where these servers are being hosted; do you really want to go down like that? Surely you can think of less incriminating shit to post on these boards as a tactic to slide Q discussion.
You people are prodigiously unimaginative.
So, on to a more "Qresearch" related subject:
>While in college and later in law school, Avenatti worked at The Research Group, a political opposition research and media firm run by Rahm Emanuel. Avenatti has ties to Rahm Emanuel. What else do anons know about this slimeball?
Having reverence for our women isn't the same as being puritan. It's way more complex than that. There's a point where "freedom of expression" and "art" are just parodies and perversions of the original intent; to invoke awareness and appreciation of true beauty.
Cases like Flynt are prime examples of where we lost our way as time marched on, and patriots weren't paying attention.
And knowing what we now know of Playboy and Hefner's ties to CIA, what does that make evident about it's use to placate men into doing less with their God given talents?
You made no argument with this post. At all.
>Keep your phony morality to yourself.
>force their homoerotic views on others.
>Fucking clown/shill bitch.
>obsessed with porn ya freakin' pervert.
Absolutely ZERO arguments made. A lot of shit flinging, sure, but no arguments. Again, if you want to advocate for the need to post tits, or let others do it for you, take it to /pol/, and see how far it gets you.
I think what Q means, is, they come here pretending to be anons, then use various tactics to divide real anons. Example:
We have baker babes? They start posting Nudes. Nudes lead to other shit, then the real message/purpose of the board gets lost in nonsense debates over whether or not tits should be allowed here. This has been one of their best attacks yet because there are still tons of folks out there that think posting tits is all about freedom of speech instead of "just another distraction".
Sex is one of their subversive tools. When they segue that into CP/Pedo shit, the board has to be taken down. That's by BO/BV/Anons are fighting it; to even include tits (if necessary). Besides, there's TONS of other places for that type of thing. If anons think they need to see that, take a break from Qresearch, and come back after you've gotten your jollies.
Other tactics used are ad hominem (you're a shill!), no true scotsman (I've been here since the beginning, and…), non sequiturs, strawman arguments, etc. They've literally tried it all, and this place still stands. They won't succeed.
They will fail just like all the other times. Notice as there will be fewer "muh tits" posters and they switch back to Gore/BBC/Scat. They work in shifts, getting paid pennies for their service to their masters.
Excellent post; did not notice this before. Glad it is in the notables!