665

Feb 05, 2018 10:42:15 AM EST

Q !UW.yye1fxo ID: 641129 No. 274607

Feb 05, 2018 10:41:35 AM EST

Q !UW.yye1fxo ID: 641129 No. 274601

>>274558

Would POTUS make a serious accusation if the TRUTH wasn’t about to come to LIGHT?

Black Forest.

Austria.

Rothschild.

FIRE sale days after post?

What went on there?

Dopey.

You have more than you know.

Q

>>274601

BLUNT statement.

Q

666

Feb 05, 2018 12:16:50 PM EST

Q !UW.yye1fxo ID: 472124 No. 275544

Why did the #Memo drop a Friday [& before the SB]?

Did this seem strange to you?

Watch the news.

Rothschild estate sale[Black Forest].

Stock market DIVE[666 - coincidence?].

Soros transfer of wealth.

Dopey FREED.

Marriage for POWER, not LOVE.

Hilton/Roth.

Soros/Clinton.

Etc.

News unlocks MAP.

Think Mirror.

Which team?

THEY don't know.

APACHE.

These people are EVIL.

Still don't believe you are SHEEP to them?

20/20 coming.

PUBLIC is VITAL.

RELEASE of INFO VITAL.

OUTRAGE.

JUSTICE.

Can we simply arrest the opposition w/o first exposing the TRUTH?

FOLLOW THE LIGHT.

Q

667

Feb 05, 2018 12:18:31 PM EST

Q !UW.yye1fxo ID: 472124 No. 275572

Feb 05, 2018 12:16:50 PM EST

Q !UW.yye1fxo ID: 472124 No. 275544

Why did the #Memo drop a Friday [& before the SB]?

Did this seem strange to you?

Watch the news.

Rothschild estate sale[Black Forest].

Stock market DIVE[666 - coincidence?].

Soros transfer of wealth.

Dopey FREED.

Marriage for POWER, not LOVE.

Hilton/Roth.

Soros/Clinton.

Etc.

News unlocks MAP.

Think Mirror.

Which team?

THEY don't know.

APACHE.

These people are EVIL.

Still don't believe you are SHEEP to them?

20/20 coming.

PUBLIC is VITAL.

RELEASE of INFO VITAL.

OUTRAGE.

JUSTICE.

Can we simply arrest the opposition w/o first exposing the TRUTH?

FOLLOW THE LIGHT.

Q

>>275544

[666]

Signal to POTUS THEY CONTROL THE MARKET?

SIGNAL?

THREAT?

WELCOME TO THE GLOBAL WAR.

Q

Q !ITPb.qbhqo 11/14/2017 21:25:29 ID: wmN+33xv #154

4chan/pol: 149467690

Who financed 9-11?

Who was Bin Laden’s handler?

Why was the Clowns In America tasked to hunt/kill/capture UBL?

Why not MI?

If we found UBL, eliminated his security, why would we immediately kill him and not take him alive?

Why wouldn’t we want to capture UBL alive and extract other possible T-level events?

Perhaps someday people will understand ‘they’ had a plan to conduct ‘another’ mass extinction event.

WWI & II - orchestrated and planned by select families?

Fantasy land.

Remember, the more people there are, the more power the people have.

Why do D’s push for gun control ‘directly’ after every tragic incident?

Why is this so very important to their agenda?

We, the people, are who they are afraid of.

We, the people, are who they fear will one day awake.

Our Father who art in heaven,

Hallowed be thy name.

Thy kingdom come.

Thy will be done

on earth as it is in heaven.

Give us this day our daily bread,

and forgive us ourtrespasses,

as we forgive those whotrespassagainst us,

and lead us not into temptation,

but deliver us from evil.

Q

Q !ITPb.qbhqo 12/09/2017 13:12:19 ID: 571cae#306

8chan/cbts: 60141

News unlocks map.

Future proves past.

Why was the Lord's prayer posted?

Which version?

Why is this relevant?

What just came out re: the Lord's prayer?

What can be connected?

Do you believe in coincidences?

Re-review the map post relevant news drops.

Godfather III.

Q

Dec 09, 2017 1:16:56 PM EST#307

Q !ITPb.qbhqo ID: 571cae No. 60172

Dec 09, 2017 1:13:29 PM EST

Anonymous ID: e60938 No. 60150

Dec 09, 2017 1:12:19 PM EST

Q !ITPb.qbhqo ID: 571cae No. 60141

News unlocks map.

Future proves past.

Why was the Lord's PRAYER posted?

Which version?

Why is this relevant?

What just came out re: the Lord's PRAYER?

What can be connected?

Do you believe in coincidences?

Re-review the map post relevant news drops.

Godfather III.

Q

>>60141

Tues Nov 4th,

Who financed 9-11?

Who was Bin Laden's handler?

Why was the Clowns In America tasked to hunt/kill/capture UBL?

Why not MI?

If we found UBL, eliminated his security, why would we immediately kill him and not take him alive?

Why wouldn't we want to capture UBL alive and extract other possible T-level events?

Perhaps someday people will understand ‘they' had a plan to conduct ‘another' mass extinction event.

WWI & II - orchestrated and planned by select families?

Fantasy land.

Remember, the more people there are, the more power the people have.

Why do D's push for gun control ‘directly' after every tragic incident?

Why is this so very important to their agenda?

We, the people, are who they are afraid of.

We, the people, are who they fear will one day awake.

Our Father who art in heaven,

Hallowed be thy name.

Thy kingdom come.

Thy will be done

on earth as it is in heaven.

Give us this day our daily bread,

and forgive us our trespasses,

as we forgive those who trespass against us,

and lead us not into temptation,

but deliver us from evil.

Q

>>60150

The "marker."

Learn to read the map.

News unlocks the map.

Q

Dec 09, 2017 1:21:38 PM EST#308

Q !ITPb.qbhqo ID: 571cae No. 60201

Tangent.

Expand your thinking.

Q

Judge allows families of 9/11 victims to sue Saudi Arabia for allegedly helping hijackers

Updated on: August 28, 2025 / 5:32 PM EDT / CBS News

A federal judge in New York denied a motion by the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia to dismiss a lawsuit brought by families of 9/11 victims who are seeking to hold the Middle Eastern country responsible for potentially providing support to the hijackers, allowing the suit to proceed.

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/judge-families-911-victims-sue-saudi-arabia-over-hijackers/

>>23534558

Remember when Q prayed the Roman Catholic Version of the "Our Father" or Pater Noster with anons in a drop about who financed 9-11?

Remember when Q posted drop #306 and asked "Why was the Lord's prayer posted? Which version? Why is this relevant? What just came out re: the Lord's prayer? What can be connected? & Do you believe in coincidences?

Remember when Q asked anons to "Re-review the map post relevant news drops." and "GODFATHERIII"?

PATER noster, qui es in cœlis; sanctificetur nomen tuum: Adveniat regnum tuum; fiat voluntas tua, sicut in cœlo, et in terra.

Panem nostrum cotidianum da nobis hodie: Et dimitte nobis debita nostra, sicut et nos dimittimus debitoribus nostris: et ne nos inducas in tentationem: sed libera nos a malo.

Q !!Hs1Jq13jV6 09/30/2020 23:52:42 ID: 376386 4799

8kun/qresearch: 10864489

Anonymous 09/30/2020 23:43:23 ID:39774c

8kun/qresearch: 10864305

Image Name: 09302020nyt1.png

Filename: 08e41859ca2515db376999299074104a284701075e774fa4c4ab36b1ebe9d5d8.png

Rebuffed by Vatican, Pompeo Assails China and Aligns With Pope’s Critics

Pope Francis declined to see Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, who is demanding a harder Vatican line on China. The Holy See said meeting just before a U.S. election would be inappropriate.

By Jason Horowitz and Lara Jakes

Sept. 30, 2020, 7:26 p.m. ET

ROME — Secretary of State Mike Pompeo recently published a sharp letter excoriating the Vatican’s plans to renew an agreement with the Chinese government on Church operations in China. He promoted the article in a tweet, concluding, “The Vatican endangers its moral authority, should it renew the deal.”

An indignant Vatican took the article more as a calculated affront than a diplomatic gesture. The friction broke into the open on Wednesday as Mr. Pompeo arrived in Rome and met with prelates and others who are hostile to Pope Francis, while the Vatican denied him a meeting with the pontiff and rebuffed his efforts to derail the deal with China.

“Pompeo asked to meet” the pope, who turned him down because Francis had “clearly said that he does not receive political figures ahead of the elections,” Cardinal Pietro Parolin, who, as secretary of state, is the Vatican’s second-ranking official, told reporters.

But to some observers on both sides of the tensions between the Roman Catholic Church and the Trump administration, Mr. Pompeo’s visit is as much about the coming presidential election as about China policy. Mr. Pompeo dismissed that suggestion as absurd, but intended or not, his trip signals that President Trump is on the side of those conservative American Catholics who worry about the church’s direction under Francis and think he is soft on China.

Francis and Mr. Trump, who have exchanged sharp words in the past, present starkly different visions on issues ranging from the environment to immigration to the threat of populism. In appealing to the Vatican’s support for religious freedom as a reason to drop its China agreement, Mr. Pompeo seemed to seek common ground, but in a way that upset the pope’s chief allies and delighted his chief critics.

Cardinal Parolin said Mr. Pompeo’s article had caused “surprise” at the Vatican, because this visit to Rome by the secretary and the meetings with high officials at the Holy See had already been in the works and would have been a “more opportune” forum for airing grievances. He added that Mr. Pompeo’s choice to publish in First Things, a conservative Christian magazine that has called Francis a failure as Pope, also mattered.

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/09/30/world/europe/pompeo-pope-francis-china.html

>>10864305

When does a Church become a playground?

When does a Church become a business?

When does a Church become political?

When does a Church become corrupt?

When does a Church become willfully blind?

When does a Church become controlled?

Q

Melania ‘likes’ Putin – Trump

30 Jul, 2025

The US president has recently threatened Russia with sanctions over the Ukraine conflict

FILE PHOTO: Russian President Vladimir Putin and US President Donald Trump, center, with his wife, Melania, during a meeting at the Presidential Palace in Helsinki. © Sputnik / Alexey Nikolskiy

US First Lady Melania Trump “likes” Russian President Vladimir Putin, but is disappointed over the continuation of the Ukraine conflict, President Donald Trump has said. Moscow is willing to negotiate but has maintained that any talks must address the root causes of the conflict.

Since assuming office this year, Trump has said he respects both Russia and Putin and wants to find a diplomatic solution to the conflict. In recent weeks, however, he has increasingly expressed frustration over a lack of progress in the peace process and has threatened Moscow with more sanctions.

In Tuesday’s episode of Pod Force One, the US president said: “We know Putin and she [Melania] likes him,” adding that he “got along with him very well.”

However, Trump noted that shortly after his recent conversation with the Russian president, Melania had commented it was “too bad they just bombed Kiev.”

On Tuesday, Trump cut his 50-day deadline for Moscow and Kiev to reach a peace deal to just 10 days, warning of sweeping sanctions targeting Russia's trading partners if no agreement is reached. Russian officials have rejected the US president's ultimatums.

Kremlin responds to Trump’s Ukraine deadline change READ MORE: Kremlin responds to Trump’s Ukraine deadline change

Earlier this month, The Times published a report suggesting that Melania Trump’s role in shaping her husband’s decisions could be underestimated. While Trump has insisted that his wife simply wants to see an end to the bloodshed, the outlet pointed to her influence as a possible factor behind his shifting stance on the Ukraine conflict.

Melania, 55, was born in Soviet-era Slovenia – now a staunch supporter of Kiev, the outlet pointed out, adding that her deep interest in the conflict reflects that background.

US lawmaker Don Bacon echoed that view in an interview this month, saying the first lady could deserve credit for Trump’s apparent turn against Russia.

“His position on Ukraine has clearly evolved,” Bacon said, noting that he wouldn’t be surprised if Melania played a “quiet but important part in that.”

https://www.rt.com/news/622247-melania-trump-likes-putin-trump/

Oct 31, 2017 11:00:47 PM EDT15

Anonymous ID: grTMpzrL No. 147434025

There are more good people than bad. The wizards and warlocks (inside term) will not allow another Satanic Evil POS control our country. Realize Soros, Clintons, Obama, PUTIN, etc. are all controlled by 3 families (the 4th was removed post Trump's victory).

11.3 - Podesta indicted

11.6 - Huma indicted

Manafort was placed into Trump's camp (as well as others). The corruption that will come out is so serious that deals must be cut for people to walk away otherwise 70% of elected politicians would be in jail (you are seeing it already begin). A deep cleaning is occurring and the prevention and defense of pure evil is occurring on a daily basis. They never thought they were going to lose control of the Presidency (not just D's) and thought they had control since making past mistakes (JFK, Reagan).

Good speed, Patriots.

PS, Soros is targeted.

Dan Scavino Jr.🇺🇸🦅@DanScavino

You should be, Andrew. Stay strong—All of our prayers are with your father, @RudyGiuliani

right now. If you need anything, we’re all here for you, just let us know!

Quote

Andrew H. Giuliani@AndrewHGiuliani

I’m a very proud Son!

4:19 PM · Aug 31, 2025

https://x.com/DanScavino/status/1962248797410427257

The Order of Saints Maurice and Lazarus(Italian: Ordine dei Santi Maurizio e Lazzaro) (abbreviated OSSML) is a Roman Catholic dynastic order of knighthood bestowed by the royal House of Savoy. It is the second-oldest order of knighthood in the world, tracing its lineage to AD 1098, and it is one of the rare orders of knighthood recognized by papal bull, in this case by Pope Gregory XIII.[2] In that bull, Pope Gregory XIII bestowed upon Emmanuel Philibert, Duke of Savoy and his Savoy successors, the right to confer this knighthood in perpetuity. The Grand Master is Prince Emanuele Filiberto of Savoy, Prince of Venice, also known as the Duke of Savoy, the grandson of the last King of Italy, Umberto II. However, Emanuele Filiberto's cousin twice removed Prince Aimone, Duke of Aosta claims to be grand master as his father claimed to be head of the house of Savoy.

The order was formerly awarded by the Kingdom of Italy (1861–1946) with the heads of the House of Savoy as the Kings of Italy. Originally a chivalric order of noble nature, it was restricted to subjects of noble families with proofs of at least eight noble great-grandparents. The order's military and noble nature was and is still combined with a Roman Catholic character.

After the abolition of the monarchy and the foundation of the Italian Republic in 1946, the legacy of the order is maintained by the pretenders of the House of Savoy and the Italian throne in exile.

The order is estimated to include about 2,000 members around the world, with about 200 in the United States. The Order also has roster consultative status with the United Nations, as part of the U.N.'s ECOSOC.[3]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Order_of_Saints_Maurice_and_Lazarus

Politics

Diplomat Isaac Artom

Tomáš Garrigue Masaryk, 1921

Enrico d’Arienzo, Prefect of Caltanisetta 1925

Henri Jaspar

Charles, 1st Count de Broqueville

Charles Rogier

Edmond, Baron de Sélys Longchamps

President Porfirio Díaz

Dr Hans Frank, 26.9.1936[15]

Minister of foreign affairs Giustino Fortunato[16]

Member of Parliament Cristiana Muscardini

Diplomat Jose Maria Quijano Wallis[17]

Luigi, Count Cibrario

Oswald, Freiherr von Richthofen, State Secretary for Foreign Affairs of the German Empire - August 1902 - during the visit to Germany of King Victor Emmanuel III of Italy[18]

President of the 1904 Louisiana Purchase Exposition and Former St. Louis Mayor David R. Francis[19]

Mayor Rudolph Giuliani of New York City (2001) Cavaliere di Gran Croce (Motu Proprio)[20]

Aldo Oviglio, Minister of Justice (1922–1925)

James Charles Risk of New York City, Cavaliere di Gran Croce,[21] originally inducted by the last reigning King of Italy, Umberto II of Italy

Benito Mussolini, Prime Minister of Italy and Duce of Fascism

Francesco Ruffini, Italian jurist, historian, politician and antifascist.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Order_of_Saints_Maurice_and_Lazarus

>>23534573

Dan Scavino Jr.🇺🇸🦅@DanScavino

You should be, Andrew. Stay strong—All of our prayers are with your father, @RudyGiuliani

right now. If you need anything, we’re all here for you, just let us know!

Quote

Andrew H. Giuliani@AndrewHGiuliani

I’m a very proud Son!

4:19 PM · Aug 31, 2025

https://x.com/DanScavino/status/1962248797410427257

419

Dec 21, 2017 11:49:21 PM EST

Q !UW.yye1fxo ID: 913540 No. 145418

Dec 21, 2017 11:48:30 PM EST

Anonymous ID: 913540 No. 145408

Test.

Q

>>145408

Trip works on single device.

Multiple devices required.

Q

1619

Jun 28, 2018 12:22:02 PM EDT

Q !CbboFOtcZs ID: 3831d8 No. 1940684

Why are they trying to ‘normalize’ this?

https://nypost.com/2018/03/05/facebook-survey-asks-users-if-they-condone-pedophilia/

What is coming?

Do they really believe this will EVER be swallowed?

Will the progressive LEFT defend and support these actions once those guilty are brought to LIGHT?

These people are SICK!

They do NOT love this country.

Q

257

Dec 04, 2017 11:30:26 PM EST

Q !ITPb.qbhqo ID: eda158 No. 34655

Dec 04, 2017 11:24:46 PM EST

Anonymous ID: 6ee2e0 No. 34602

Q pointed out the picture on the RED.ORG site with the Korean woman pointing to "Meet Me In Seoul" Obummer goes to China, did he go to Seoul too?

>>34602

>>23534573

>>23534574

Rudy was always MR 911 TERROR TERROR 911 NEOCON piece of shit

Just because you stand next to Trump doesnt mean jack shit to me

>>23534578

"Mike Pence has my complete and total endorsement"

Trump tariffs: What happens next after court rules them illegal? part 1 AUG 30 2025

A federal appeals court has ruled that most of Donald Trump's tariffs are an overreach of his use of emergency powers as president.

The so-called reciprocal tariffs - imposed on nearly every country the US trades with - are being illegally imposed, the US Court of Appeals said on Friday.

The decision upholds a ruling in May from the Court of International Trade, which also rejected Trump's argument that his global tariffs were permitted under an emergency economic powers act.

Many of the tariffs that would be affected by the ruling stem from an announcement in April of a flat 10% rate on imports from all countries, which Trump said would even out "unfair" trade relations with the US.

The court did not halt the tariffs but instead said they would remain in place until mid-October, setting up a further legal challenge in the US Supreme Court.

There are still a lot of unknowns, but here's what we understand so far about the ruling - and what it could mean for the US president's flagship policy.

What did the appeals court say?

In its 7-4 decision, the appellate court backed a lower court's finding that Trump did not have the authority to impose global tariffs.

This was largely because of the law Trump used to justify the policies, the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), which the judges said did not grant "the power to impose tariffs, duties, or the like, or the power to tax".

The US Court of Appeals rejected Trump's argument that the tariffs were permitted under his emergency economic powers, calling the levies "invalid as contrary to law".

Trump immediately criticised the judgement, taking to Truth Social in the hours after it landed to call the appeals court "highly partisan" and the ruling a "disaster" for the country.

"If allowed to stand, this Decision would literally destroy the United States of America," he wrote.

What is the IEEPA?'''

The decades-old act, which has repeatedly been deployed by Trump during both his terms in office, grants a US president significant authority to respond to a national emergency or a major threat from overseas.

The 1977 law states that a president can pull a number of economic levers "to deal with any unusual and extraordinary threat, which has its source in whole or substantial part outside the United States, to the national security, foreign policy or economy".

It's been used by both Presidents Barack Obama and Joe Biden, who invoked the act to impose sanctions on Russia after the illegal annexation of Crimea in 2014, and then again after the full-scale invasion of Ukraine eight years later.

But the appeals court stated in its decision that the emergency law "did not give the president wide-ranging authority to impose tariffs".

The IEEPA "neither mentions tariffs (or any of its synonyms) nor has procedural safeguards that contain clear limits on the president's power to impose tariffs", they said.

Trump argued when he unveiled his global tariffs that a trade imbalance was harmful to US national security, and was therefore a national emergency.

But the court ruled that imposing tariffs is not within the president's mandate, and "the power of the purse (including the power to tax) belongs to Congress".

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cy983g8jr5do

>>23534582

Trump tariffs: What happens next after court rules them illegal? part 2

Why is this important?'''

Beyond being a significant setback to a centrepiece of Trump's agenda, the federal appeals court ruling could have an immediate impact on the US economy, with knock-on effects felt in global markets.

Tariffs are taxes companies have to pay for importing certain goods from foreign countries - so they can have an affect on sales and profit margins.

"Businesses are going to be subject to uncertainty," Dr Linda Yueh, an economist at Oxford University and the London Business School, told BBC Radio 4's Today programme.

Tariffs are aimed at deterring domestic firms from buying foreign goods, in turn affecting international trade.

As countries wait to see if the US Supreme Court will take up the case - which seems likely - they could decide to hold off on conducting business with the US.

If this happens, Dr Yueh said, it could "dampen down economic activity".

There are also significant ramifications that could be felt within the political sphere.

For instance, if the Supreme Court reverses the federal appeals court decision and sides with the Trump administration, it could set a precedent that emboldens the president to use the IEEPA more aggressively than he has done so far.

What happens next?

The case will now most likely proceed to the highest US court, a challenge that Trump signalled on Truth Social.

"Tariffs were allowed to be used against us by our uncaring and unwise Politicians," Trump wrote. "Now, with the help of the United States Supreme Court, we will use them to the benefit of our Nation, and Make America Rich, Strong, and Powerful Again!"

The conservative majority on the US Supreme Court could potentially make it more likely to side with the president's view.

Six of the nine justices were appointed by Republican presidents, including three who Trump selected during his first term in the White House.

But the court has also been more critical of presidents when it seems they're overreaching on policies not directly authorised by Congress.

During Joe Biden's presidency, for example, the court expanded on what it called the "major questions doctrine" to invalidate Democratic efforts to use existing laws to limit greenhouse gas emissions by power plants and to forgive student loan debt for millions of Americans.

What if the tariffs are ruled illegal?

The federal appeals court was divided 7-4 in its decision that Trump's nearly universal tariffs are illegal. It has now given the US administration until mid-October to appeal to the US Supreme Court on a case with implications for both the US economy and its trade relationship with the rest of the world.

If the Supreme Court affirms the decision, it could trigger uncertainty in financial markets.

There will be questions over whether the US will have to pay back billions of dollars that have been gathered by import taxes on products.

It could also throw into question whether major economies - including the UK, Japan and South Korea - are locked into the individual trade deals they secured with the US ahead of the August deadline. Other trade deals currently being negotiated could also be thrown into chaos.

If allowed to stand, the appeals court decision would also be a tremendous blow to Trump's political authority and reputation as a dealmaker. But if it were overturned by the Supreme Court, it would have the opposite effect.

Are there still tariffs in place?

This ruling affects Trump's "reciprocal tariffs", which includes a patchwork of different rates on most countries around the world, including taxes slapped on products from China, Mexico and Canada.

Those levies on nearly all goods from nearly every country with which the US conducts trade will remain in place until mid-October.

After 14 October, they will no longer be enforceable, the appeals court has said.

Separately, the tariffs on steel, aluminum and copper, which were brought in under a different presidential authority, will remain intact and unaffected by the court's ruling.

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cy983g8jr5do

>>23534584

Trump tariffs: What happens next after court rules them illegal? Aug 30 2025

A federal appeals court has ruled that most of Donald Trump's tariffs are an overreach of his use of emergency powers as president.

BBC - https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cy983g8jr5do

Most Trump tariffs ruled illegal by appeals court, dealing major blow to trade policy Aug 30 2025

A federal appeals court ruled that most of President Donald Trump's global tariffs are illegal, striking a massive blow to the core of his…

CNBC - https://www.cnbc.com/2025/08/29/trump-trade-tariffs-appeals-court-ieepa.html

Governor Newsom issues statement on court decision AGAIN ruling Trump’s tariffs as unlawful Aug 30 2025

What you need to know: Once again, a court ruled that Trump's tariffs are unlawful. SACRAMENTO — Governor Gavin Newsom issued the following…

California State Portal (.gov) - https://www.gov.ca.gov/2025/08/29/governor-newsom-issues-statement-on-court-decision-again-ruling-trumps-tariffs-as-unlawful/

Bessent Warns of US ‘Embarrassment’ If Tariffs Ruled Illegal Aug 30 2025

Trump cabinet officials told a federal appeals court that ruling the president's global tariffs illegal would seriously harm US foreign…

Bloomberg.com - https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2025-08-29/bessent-lutnick-urge-appeals-court-to-pause-any-order-against-trump-s-tariffs

Here’s what to know about the court ruling striking down Trump’s tariffs Aug 30 2025

A federal appeals court said the president overstepped his authority when he imposed sweeping import duties.

The Guardian - https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/aug/30/trump-tariffs-explainer

Trump’s Sweeping Tariffs Invalidated by Appeals Court Aug 30 2025

A federal appeals court ruled on Friday that many of President Trump's most punishing tariffs were illegal, delivering a major setback to…

The New York Times - https://www.nytimes.com/2025/08/29/business/economy/trump-tariffs-appeals-court.html

An appeals court said Trump couldn’t levy his tariffs. What happens now? Aug 30 2025

Despite the ruling, the appellate judges let President Donald Trump's tariffs stand to allow time for a likely appeal to the U.S. Supreme…

The Washington Post - https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2025/08/30/trump-tariffs-court-ruling-explained/

Most of President Trump's tariffs are illegal, U.S. court rules Aug 30 2025

An appeals court ruled that most of President Trump's tariffs are illegal — but held off on enforcing the decision until mid-October,…

NPR - https://www.npr.org/2025/08/29/nx-s1-5522457/tariffs-trump-trade-supreme-court

Trump blasts court's ruling that most of his tariffs are illegal Aug 30 2025

Trump blasts court's ruling that most of his tariffs are illegal. Former Deputy Independent Counsel Sol Wisenberg joins 'Fox & Friends…

Fox News - https://www.foxnews.com/video/6377798933112

Trump’s global tariffs are unlawful, appeals court says Aug 30 2025

A federal appeals court has ruled that most of President Donald Trump's sweeping global tariffs are unlawful, potentially dealing a…

ABC News - https://abcnews.go.com/US/trumps-global-tariffs-unlawful-appeals-court/story?id=125110624

>>23534585

Donald J. Trump@realDonaldTrump

https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/115124685956430001

Without Tariffs, and all of the TRILLIONS OF DOLLARS we have already taken in, our Country would be completely destroyed, and our military power would be instantly obliterated.

In a 7 to 4 Opinion, a Radical Left group of judges didn’t care, but one Democrat,Obama appointed, actually voted to save our Country.

I would like to thank him for his Courage!

He loves and respects the U.S.A.

Aug 31, 2025, 2:01 PM

What happens next after Trump tariffs ruled illegal?Aug 31 2025

A federal appeals court has ruled that most of Donald Trump's tariffs are an overreach of his use of emergency powers as president.

The so-called reciprocal tariffs - imposed on nearly every country the US trades with - are being illegally imposed, the US Court of Appeals said on Friday.

The decision upholds a ruling in May from the Court of International Trade, which also rejected Trump's argument that his global tariffs were permitted under an emergency economic powers act.

Many of the tariffs that would be affected by the ruling stem from an announcement in April of a flat 10% rate on imports from all countries, which Trump said would even out "unfair" trade relations with the US.

The court did not halt the tariffs but instead said they would remain in place until mid-October, setting up a further legal challenge in the US Supreme Court.

There are still a lot of unknowns, but here's what we understand so far about the ruling - and what it could mean for the US president's flagship policy.

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cy983g8jr5do

Donald J. Trump@realDonaldTrump

https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/114593880455063168

The U.S. Court of International Trade incredibly ruled against the United States of America on desperately needed Tariffs but, fortunately, the full 11 Judge Panel on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit Court has just stayed the order by the Manhattan-based Court of International Trade.

Where do these initial three Judges come from? How is it possible for them to have potentially done such damage to the United States of America?

Is it purely a hatred of “TRUMP?” What other reason could it be?

I was new to Washington, and it was suggested that I useThe Federalist Societyas a recommending source on Judges.

I did so, openly and freely, but then realized that they were under the thumb ofa real “sleazebag” named Leonard Leo, a bad person who, in his own way, probably hates America, and obviously has his own separate ambitions.

He openly brags how he controls Judges, and even Justices of the United States Supreme Court — I hope that is not so, and don’t believe it is!

In any event, Leo left The Federalist Society to do his own “thing.” I am so disappointed in The Federalist Society because of the bad advice they gave me on numerous Judicial Nominations.

This is something that cannot be forgotten!With all of that being said, I am very proud of many of our picks, but very disappointed in others.

They always must do what’s right for the Country!

In this case, it is only because of my successful use of Tariffs that many Trillions of Dollars have already begun pouring into the U.S.A. from other Countries, money that, without these Tariffs, we would not be able to get.

It is the difference between having a rich, prosperous, and successful United States of America, and quite the opposite. The ruling by the U.S. Court of International Trade is so wrong, and so political!

Hopefully, the Supreme Court will reverse thishorrible, Country threateningdecision, QUICKLY and DECISIVELY.

Backroom “hustlers” must not be allowed to destroy our Nation!

The horrific decision stated that I would have to get the approval of Congress for these Tariffs.

In other words, hundreds of politicians would sit around D.C. for weeks, and even months, trying to come to a conclusion as to what to charge other Countries that are treating us unfairly.

If allowed to stand, this would completely destroy Presidential Power — The Presidency would never be the same! This decision is being hailed all over the World by every Country, other than the United States of America.

Radical Left Judges, together with some very bad people, are destroying America. Under this decision, Trillions of Dollars would be lost by our Country, money that will, MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN.

It would be the harshest financial ruling ever leveled on us as a Sovereign Nation. The President of the United States must be allowed to protect America against those that are doing it Economic and Financial harm.

Thank you for your attention to this matter!

May 29, 2025, 8:10 PM

>>23534582

>>23534584

>>23534585

>>23534588

Donald J. Trump@realDonaldTrump

https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/115124685956430001

Without Tariffs, and all of the TRILLIONS OF DOLLARS we have already taken in, our Country would be completely destroyed, and our military power would be instantly obliterated.

In a 7 to 4 Opinion, a Radical Left group of judges didn’t care, but one Democrat, Obama appointed, actually voted to save our Country.

I would like to thank him for his Courage!

He loves and respects the U.S.A.

Aug 31, 2025,2:01PM

Oct 28, 2017 4:44:28 PM EDT1

Anonymous ID: BQ7V3bcW No. 147012719

Oct 28, 2017 3:33:50 PM EDT

Anonymous ID: gb953qGI No. 147005381

>>146981635

Hillary Clinton will be arrested between 7:45 AM - 8:30 AM EST on Monday - the morning on Oct 30, 2017.

>>147005381

HRC extradition already in motion effective yesterday with several countries in case of cross border run. Passport approved to be flagged effective 10/30 @ 12:01am. Expect massive riots organized in defiance and others fleeing the US to occur.US M’s will conduct the operation while NG activated. Proof check: Locate a NG member and ask if activated for duty 10/30 across most major cities.

Nov 22, 2017 5:53:22 PM EST201

Q !ITPb.qbhqo ID: 3EnVOnlV No. 150523420

Nov 22, 2017 5:51:42 PM EST

Anonymous ID: UybaYRYn No. 150523213

>>150522875

clown front?

>>150523213

May 17, 2018 2:18:48 PM EDT1401

Q !4pRcUA0lBE ID: 349934 No. 1444934

May 17, 2018 2:13:19 PM EDT

Q !4pRcUA0lBE ID: 349934 No. 1444808

>>1444682

What is the common theme when bad news is about to break (against them)?

Stay vigilant.

Q

>>1444808

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2018/05/17/report-inspector-general-will-declare-fbi-doj-broke-law-in-clinton-email-probe/

God Bless the United States of America.

D5.

Q

D5

Nov 02, 2017 12:36:31 PM EDT45

Anonymous ID: zGyR4tyi No. 147632662

Follow Huma.

What just broke w/ Huma?

What did HRC instruct Huma to do re: Classified markings?

Why is this story just now coming out?

What relevance does it have?

Why is Donna running for cover?

Was a deal granted in exchange for something?

Who made the deal?

Do we care about Donna or those who instructed her to violate the law?

Why is this being leaked v. simply prosecuted privately?

Who is attempting to change the narrative and soften the acts that are forthcoming this weekend?