>>23540818 pb

That freak who claimed DJT fingered her in a dressing room at Bergdorf Goodman's?

Total Transfemale with the MAE WEST act.

I just noticed it while watching Mae West.

The highly ribald jokes are not jokes woman think about or create.

It's a mans' (in their cases homo-s) imagination.

Remember Eugene , E Gene , E Jean made many improbable rape accusations and claimed rape was sexy (she said that on camera)

That's a trannie fantasy.

Woman don't think like that, soory.

She's another ape pretending to be a woman.

Get the DNA test, Donald ; From a lab you can trust.

Maybe there will have to be two labs; and an impartial docs exam.

Remember her claim of being penetrated by a finger relys on the fact "she" has a vagina; which is an highly dubious claim.

All of it is, But that will prove it; Prove she FOS.

>>23540887

She had a sex advise column

Will really out-there advise for women.

>>23540894

Eugene Carroll's sex column gave

really 'out-there' advise for women.

"she" needs some verbal roasting.

Does she still have a monetary claim against DJT?

As of the latest available information, E. Jean Carroll does not have a pending monetary judgment against Donald Trump in the sense of an unresolved or unpaid judgment. However, the status of the judgments involves ongoing legal processes due to appeals. Here’s a detailed breakdown based on available data:Carroll II (2023 Verdict): In May 2023, a jury found Donald Trump liable for sexual abuse and defamation related to Carroll’s allegations of a 1996 incident and his 2022 statements. The jury awarded Carroll $5 million in damages. A federal appeals court upheld this verdict on December 30, 2024, and Trump’s request for an en banc hearing was rejected in June 2025. This judgment is not pending in terms of liability or amount, but Trump has indicated he may appeal further, potentially to the U.S. Supreme Court. There is no indication in the provided sources that this payment remains unpaid, though Trump secured a bond to cover it during the appeal process.

Carroll I (2024 Verdict): In January 2024, a jury awarded Carroll $83.3 million for defamation stemming from Trump’s 2019 statements. This verdict was upheld by Judge Lewis Kaplan in April 2024, who denied Trump’s motion for a new trial. Trump posted a $92 million bond to stay the judgment while appealing, and as of the latest updates (August 2025), this appeal is still ongoing in the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals. While the judgment amount is set, the appeal keeps the case active, meaning the payment is not yet finalized pending the appeal’s outcome.

Potential New Lawsuits: Posts on X and some reports indicate that Carroll’s legal team has suggested the possibility of new defamation lawsuits due to Trump’s continued public statements against her, such as those made at a rally in 2024. However, no new lawsuits are confirmed as filed or pending with monetary judgments as of the latest data.

In summary, the $5 million judgment from 2023 is upheld and not pending in terms of liability, though further appeals may be pursued. The $83.3 million judgment from 2024 is under appeal, with a bond posted, so it is not “pending” in the sense of being unpaid but remains unresolved due to the ongoing appeal. No new monetary judgments are currently pending, though future lawsuits are possible. Always note that legal cases can evolve, and checking court records or recent news for updates is advisable

Looks like Xai is wrong. I asked again and this came up

The post references therecent overturning of a $500 million civil fraud penalty against Trump by the New York Court of Appeals on August 21, 2025,which ruled the fine excessive and potentially unconstitutional, a decision that surprised legal experts given the initial case strength.

It corrects misinformation about the E. Jean Carroll case, noting that Trump's defamation liability was based on hearsay,and recent developments on August 29, 2025, indicate Carroll may not receive damages due to lack of evidence, challenging earlier $88.3 million awards.

Federal criminal charges against Trump were dismissed post-election due to a DOJ policy from the Nixon era, reinforced by a July 2025 Supreme Court immunity ruling,

Apparently corrupt "International Bar Association" claimed the new ruling(s) was to effect an election and was politically motivated.

More relevant to our issues here, looks like the Judge and the Lawyer for Eugene are both named Kaplan,

The claim is they are not related yet Robert Roberta worked in the Judge's law offices.

Robert(a) was previously mentored by the Judge Robert(A) Kaplan looks to be transfemale.

picrel

What are the chances Lewis of the Carroll case is a fagoot and the lawyer is a transfemale and Carroll too a transfemale?

>>23540887

>>23540894

>>23540907

https://x.com/C_3C_3/status/1958711563839242584

Didn't realize E Jean's award was denied last week ,, And also Tish recently had her award also denied.

don't hear much of that?

follow news every day and did not learn that.

>>23541046

I think Grok got the Tish and the Eugene's cases conflated.

It 's not easy being a politically correct AI

Both fagoots have got the glasses.

>>23541078

it's an old word.

But maybe not in English.

It not old in English, I checked.

It's from Latin

"Conflation"

And I used it correctly

Combining, blowing together, as of two variant readings into a single text; which is what I did writing about the two Trump lawfare cases..

"Conflation" "conflated", is at least a word in American English since 1966

I have no idea how I know certain words.

People in my family would think I was lying if I said the meaning of a word they didn't know, and call me a liar. Until they looked it up.

I don't know how I learn these things except I read a lot, over a lot of years; starting when I was young.

And yes, I've had people mad hate me for getting higher scores.

Comes with the territory, I guess.

Also, had the trouble where people didn't know what I was going - on about, which i my fault for not trying harder to be understood.

>>23541149

now you are lying.

kekek

>>23541149

Whatever, it's LATIN, which is an old language.

The virtue signal thing is purely your projection.

why do you have to hate?

Is it jealousy?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z96qe75LOF8

Let me guess. I'm a jew.

kekkkek

>>23541099

https://youtu.be/Qg47g9RE8e4?si=2GeCGRwV-Nc1Rc_k

>>23541171

Oh right ur a shill.

have a good day.

Hope you straighten out

Trump is opening the mental hospitals

>>23541171

Are these new bakers always so arrogant. Or is it just dayshift

Refugees from Reddit?

>>23541078

poseur

>>23541149

"It's not a word"

You're really arrogant and stupid aren't you?

>>23541078

"Didn't seem to exist when anon was young"

Were you born in the 19th c. or in the Ancient World or are you just illiterate?

>>23541149

The word "conflated" is the past participle form of the verb "conflate," which means to bring together, blend, or confuse (often by fusing distinct elements into one). Its etymology traces back to Latin conflatus, the past participle of conflare (literally "to blow together"), from the roots con- ("together") and flare ("to blow").

This Latin origin dates to classical antiquity (around the 1st century BCE or earlier), but the word's age in English is measured from its earliest attested use in the language.The earliest known usage of "conflated" in English is from1541, in the sense of "blown together" or "brought together from various sources."

Some sources date the first appearance of the base verb "conflate" slightly later, to1557.

As of September 2025, this makes "conflated" approximately484 years oldin English.The modern sense of "conflated" (as in mistakenly combining or confusing two things, like ideas or concepts) emerged later, around1885, in the context of textual criticism (e.g., fusing variant readings of a text).

Earlier uses in English were more literal, relating to fusing or melting materials.

"Really a newfangled word put out by the WOKE people."

LIE ^^^

I think the "It's not a word" is from the uneducated sophist, not the other way around. Nobody nowadays gets a good education. The learn from what they are told.

Somebody decided to label "conflate" not a word? Was that before you were born? How old are you 15?

>>23541149

Never trust a person who says, "Trust me."

>>23541238

This I agree.

Whatever MOS means, it's not good.

maybe mossad, maybe not.

The intelligence services always rename everything anyway.

The ones who insist it's not Mossad are jokes.

As if anyone could know.

It's just their prejudice bias that will not let them be open to what it might mean

>>23541283

if you have animals you feed every day you will know they have hope

>>23541153

did you also believe Trump was dead because of feelies?

>>23541260

delusional waiting for the psych wards to open.

I only said the word wasn't a old English word because it didn't appear in my 18th c. dictionary.

What is your lifespan, like a flea

But you call yourself wise.

What did Socrates allegedly say about people who called themselves "wise" ?

Aren't they just "wiseguys" "know it alls:" poseurs?

^ If you don't know it, there's always the dictionary.

Making up your own words is cool, but telling others words don't exist which exist in the dictionary and by common usages mean you might be delusion and should lay off the pots.

>>23541341

Is fake news, lies and shill gangster?

>>23541352

Vati was spam but did it with some good info.

It ws to desensitize peeps to the info.

I think it was out of AJ's studio ?

Most people here knew AJ was fraud long before Vati appeared.

In fact that info was even here before Q confirmed it.

>>23541363

That fifth meme I found posted on the street.

"keep family control" "using marriages and money" was before I 'heard' or surmised that from Q posts.

(If anyone thinks "surmised" isn't a word, look it up!)

>>23541382

8e706b

the reddit guy filtered me.

Naturally announces it, like the putz it is.

Is that a baker now?

If so, mazeltov, We need Bakers.

>>23541341

>>23541336

do you have to sign in to google for the download?

>>23541341

About wiseguys the saying is:

"those that say don't know.

Those that know don't say"

>>23541104

cry moar, karen

>>23541261

Question was:

"Do animals have hope."

>>23541289

not everything is about you, clown

refugee from reddit.

>>23541295

Yes, I'm not an illiterate clown like you.

I know you're an evil clown (of the dayshift) because you think you have a right to force people to answer your question.

And you pretend they are wrong.

How long have you practiced interrogation?

No one has to answer your fucking questions.

And if they refuse to answer that doesn't make them wrong, Pedesta.

We're not your abused child.