Domestic Enemy to the Constitution of the United States unlawfully detains and demands ID for no crime, no RAS of a crime.
LE, blatantly violating our rights, constitution, and laws daily across the nation.
How much of that violence can be attributed to the nations unlawful "war on drugs"?
Domestic Enemy to the Constitution of the United States, at blatantly unconstitutional "check point" INSIDE our borders, unlawfully detains and unlawfully claims citizen must answer questions, which is absolutely false.
Government courts convinced people government gets to "weigh government interest" against the rights government is FORBIDDEN from infringing upon, and morans fell for it.
There is also no lawful obligation to answer any questions or even refuse to speak.
*Or even speak. We can LAWFULLY refuse to speak to them and there's nothing they can legally do.
They were allowed to foster an attitude of being above the people, when they're below.
Every single government employee, even the president, is BELOW the people, not above, but they foster this hero worship bullshit.
Domestic Enemies unlawfully entering a mans home, no warrant, no exigent circumstances, they don't respect even the most basic constitutional limits against government
Our home, and the curtilage of our home, is where our protections are the STRONGEST, yet they think NOTHING of unlawfully violating our rights.
Some might want to consider WHY government has fostered this.
Total nonsense. The Constitution is THE law, every law repugnant to it in the United States is lawfully void. States can ONLY create laws that do not violate the constitutionally protected rights of the people. The states DO NOT have authority to overrule those limits, even if all 50 states agree. Take the 2nd, the very act of amending it to allow infringement IS a violation of the constitution in itself. Why do you think so many in government have unlawfully given themselves/their fellow conspirators "immunity" for such acts?
There is a COUP against the constitution.
So when do they admit they never had the authority and arrests begin?
And when do we start talking about DCs (Davids Camp) census?
In the minds of some, the law is whatever those in power say it is. They would gladly bow to total tyranny if it meant saving themselves.
>You got what you voted for.
KMAO a very old lie.
We the People are the rightful masters, not Trump.
I should say just monetarily. By all means take the money from the criminals, but they need to face charges.
I know it was, and what I said stands. I don't give a shit about the money, which is all some care about (not saying you).
Domestic Enemy demanding ID for trespass warning (unlawful) and then arresting for trespass, AT A POST OFFICE FOR LAWFULLY RECORDING, which USPS and Homeland Security has reminded is constitutionally protected and ABOVE the feelings of USPS employees or cops.
Also, local cops often don't know they don't have any jurisdiction at the post office unless the department has a contract, it's federal property and USPS has its own law enforcement, which includes both Postal Inspectors and Postal Police Officers (PPOs). I've watched cases thrown out immediately in court because the officers had no jurisdiction to begin with.
Absolutely false.
The constitution is THE highest law of the land. The constitution FORBIDS government, whether it be the Judicial, Legislature, Executive, or all three, they are FORBIDDEN from violating those rights.
Also, it is a well recognized RIGHT to "throw off" government when it becomes necessary, and the 2nd amendment protects our right to the means to do so.
Trumps immunity and every other is unconstitutional, and void. It's a violation of equal protections under the law.
Sounds like a coward trying to justify the violation of the peoples rights and constitution.
The constitution is meant to protect even one person from the majority.
I think you'll find some behind the creation of the United States pre-planned the destruction of the United States.
kek no.
Every individual has certain rights that even the majority do not have authority to infringe.
If every person in the United States voted tomorrow that you're not allowed to speak, the constitution protects you from that, or is supposed to.
You're correct that people can choose to ignore the law and just kill you, remove your tongue etc, but they can never have authority to stop you from speaking.
Every sworn law enforcement officer and member of the military, potus etc has sworn an oath to YOUR right to speak.
I am simply telling Truth, the US government is in violation of the constitution, and law enforcement and the courts violate the constitution and the rights of We the People it represents every single day.
People and our rights, ALL OUR RIGHTS, are what matters to me.
Not necessarily true.
The constitution protects the rights of even a single person against the majority. So when anyone swears an oath to the constitution, they are swearing an oath to uphold the individual rights of every individual.
Like I said, If every person in the United States voted tomorrow that you're not allowed to speak, the constitution protects you from that, or is supposed to. Every sworn law enforcement officer and member of the military, potus etc has sworn an oath to YOUR right to speak.
Now would you like to disuss how some rely on others constitution as an "anchor" to perform a "hand-off"?