/qresearch is not for men only. Unfortunately some Anons do not often see female human breasts. Some of those Anons then seek to demand , demean, or harass the Anons that might have female human breasts. That is simply not the intent of TOGTFO. The only board requirement is that female Anons do not appeal to gender or gender experience when engaged in discussion or debate. 'TOGTFO' simply seeks remove female privilege as a debate tool.
>so double standards.
>gotcha
Not double standards, Anon. Very rarely do discussions here devolve to: 'Well, I'm a man, so my opinion must be considered'. The TOGTFO effort was launched at a time of peak identity politics, where some Anons attempted to present an argument from authority on the basis of gender. Arguments from authority are logically invalid. Others have appealed to race, social status, class, sexual orientation, etc. in an attempt to add weight to a failing logical argument. The TOGTFO sentiment of /qresearch is rooted in chan tradition and is an attempt to remove identity politics from the discussion.
Exceptions can be arranged if an Anon claiming female privilege is willing to subject herself to the humiliation ritual and post dated time-stamped breast pics. That is a a ticket to respect for many Anons who understand the logic.
>The real news story here is the potential of ramping up operations again.
Anons should always encourage and educate one another. Word in D.C. is the board would attract more female FBIAnons if feet pics were promoted as currency to target confidential informers.
>you are failing to see it is indeed double standard.
Madam, no one here at /qresearch wants to see any more man boobs.
There is no double standard. If you claim female privilege you are respectfully requested to provide time-stamped photographic proof of your unmistakably glorious female breasts.
>superior.
> showing tits to maintain entry
This is not a board requirement. 'TOGTFO' is not intended as the price of admission. TOGTFO is a fee assessed by your peers for claiming female privilege. It should not be misused or misunderstood. The concept is rooted in logic that negates identity politics and identity privilege and was made necessary by Anons claiming female (or identity) privilege in lieu of employing sound logic.
Well said. An eloquent expression of self. Thank you for sharing this revealing comment, Anon.
Anon has not claimed a gender privilege.
>not everyone who discusses Judaism here is a 'muh joo shill'.
Are you lacking depth and background regarding the meaning and context of the term, Anon?
>Use Tranime
Unlike many of my peers here I refuse to use Tranime, Anon. It's just not right.
>the Cliff Dwellers
It is amazing the lengths the ancient people of the SW went to avoid being discovered, eaten, and shat upon their own hearths.
Thomas Massie
@RepThomasMassie
Survivors at our press conference announced they are privately compiling their own Epstein list.
They would be sued into homelessness for naming names, but
@RepMTG and I are willing to name names in the House of Representatives under Constitutional “speech or debate” immunity.
https://x.com/RepThomasMassie/status/1963385897984168364
>They have faggot asses
An Eruv allows some Jews to fool G-d by redefining their neighborhood with a wire or string.
> They created everything in the world
>Talmud, written by man.
The Seven Genders in the Talmud
Judaism has recognized nonbinary persons for millennia.
Thought nonbinary gender was a modern concept? Think again. The ancient Jewish understanding of gender was far more nuanced than many assume.
The Talmud, a huge and authoritative compendium of Jewish legal traditions, contains in fact no less than seven gender designations including:
Zachar, male.
Nekevah, female.
Androgynos, having both male and female characteristics.
Tumtum, lacking sexual characteristics.
Aylonit, identified female at birth without developing secondary female sexual characteristics at puberty.
Saris hamah, identified male at birth without developing secondary male sexual
characteristics at puberty.
Saris adam, identified male at birth without developing secondary male sexual characteristics because of castration.
The rabbis did not use the word gender as we do today, as referring to a cultural construct distinct from biological sex. The seven genders they describe are distinguished by physical and biological realities, not culturally conditioned categories. But because gender has many implications in Jewish law, how the rabbis understood these categories has consequences for the rights and responsibilities such individuals enjoy in the community.
The rabbis also had a tradition that the first human being was both male and female.
https://www.myjewishlearning.com/article/the-eight-genders-in-the-talmud/
>That's not how it works.
>If an anon uses the word husband or boyfriend or he or him or in any way gives any indication of being female, she is assaulted with TOGTFO. She does not need to claim gender privilege.
Then newfag Anons are misusing the TOGTFO concept. No Anon should be harassed for identifying as female unless the status of female is claimed as an advantage in order to prevail in an argument, discussion, or disagreement. Newfag Anons need to GTFU, grow up, when dealing with female Anons. The intent of TOGTFO is to discourage claims of gender privilege.