From previous bread to BO

>>2351700

I've been following (lurking) on this board since November. I've passed on links and information to several friends who expresses interest following verbal discussions about what all is happening in our government today.

But as a middle-aged female the profound disrespect aimed at women in general in most every thread is off-putting, to say the least. And it has prevented me from sharing the Q movement with dozens of other friends who I know would be disgusted and automatically tune out.

We KNOW that vast numbers of young women will refuse to read anything on a site hosting nudes or even semi-nudes of women in virtually every thread. But what you don't know is that it applies to significant numbers of middle age Trump-supporting women as well.

I'm sure this will be ignored, but thought you need to consider that not finding a way to keep this shit off of these research threads will ultimately limit the number of viewers drastically. Maybe don't delete them but move them onto another thread (since newbies and converts will come here and not to one labeled "nudity" or something else besides "research"). That's not censorship but rather management.

>>2354954

I've ignored it for 9 months already. I'm just stating what should be common sense - to know your audience. If you want this info widely disseminated then consider making it (more) palatable to the wider population of potential viewers.

Of the top of my head, I can name 50 friends of mine that I wouldn't refer to this site as it stands right now. They would find it disgusing and think I'm a lunatic for being here.

But if it were actually RESEARCH about government corruption worldwide and specifically against Trump, I'd not hesitate.

>>2355037

Think about who is our most likely set of converts. It's CONSERVATIVE women who support Trump (more men already do). Being a conservative female, I can tell you that nude photos of women's asses and/or tits daily is not an environment many such women would likely visit.

I'm sure I'll get blasted for this but frankly don't give a fuck. Someone has to speak common sense about this from a perspective that is ignored.

>>2354998

Not even close. I'm an accomplished professional who knows a thing or two about successful marketing and targeting an audience. Clearly you don't.

>>2355122

Oh I can handle it just fine (and have done so for 9 months). I'm just pointing out the obvious ignorance of continuing to have material that will turn off millions of people we should WANT to visit and learn on Qresearch. Sorry you can't grasp such a simple concept.

>>2355109

Grow up, dickwad.

>>2355174

Yeah, the only problem with that is that all of the media reports about Q reference 8chan - not so much reddit.

You want them to get the sterilized, less complete view from other sources, so be it. I expected nothing less.

>>2355215

Like most who have replied, you have the reading comprehension ability of an average 3rd grader. I said clearly I can and do over look it and that it's the new (normies) coming here that will include large numbers of women who will tune out.

>>2355466

Talk about tripping over your limp dick!