BV has moved to a more reasonable position of compromise.
Argument should be over until further issue arises.
Everyone back to work.
Don't project your weakness onto the rest of us.
If you can't scroll past some tits and stay focused on our mission, you definitely don't fucking belong here.
You could also toss Palestinian men a 9 year old girl to keep them busy.
Jew tricks like that will work quite well on a population with an average IQ of 85 and a disgusting culture.
I'll go out on a limb and say that autists may have just slightly higher an average than that.
Perhaps you are that stupid, and fear for yourself, which is noble.
But again, stop projecting your weakness on to the rest of us.
There is a difference between the hardcore porn spamming you are referring to, and just general nudity which is much more common and has not nearly the same psychological potency.
And boobs have been posted consistently up until the disruption.
The thing that was introduced that caused the disruption, were the following:
-
CP being uploaded, creating the OBVIOUS, INTENDED result of nudity being scrutinized.
-
BV reacting (perhaps genuinely) to the perceived threat by banning nudity in general.
-
Most anons VERY PREDICTABLY argue against this decision.
-
Some anons inexplicably call for the ban to remain, and personally insult any anons, accusing them of literally caring about the porn instead of the issue (absurd claim).
Leaving 4 actors creating the dissonance:
>Original CP poster
Clearly, CP poster is a shill, and the source of the issue.
>BV
BV could be comped, but it is more likely that their reaction was EXPECTED and INTENDED.
>Anons arguing against any censorship
Anons arguing against censorship could be shills, but the foundational value of most chans and all anons is absolute freedom of speech and zero tolerance for censorship. It is therefore highly likely that these anons pushing back was EXPECTED and INTENDED.
>Anons arguing for censorship, using absurd claims
Anons will rarely call for censorship of any kind, for any reason. Especially inexplicable is their primary claim that nudity is too distracting, when the entire substructure of chan hive mind effectiveness relies on rapidly sharing the chaotic expression of thought through images and text. Saying an image will be distracting to autists on a chan is like saying those sticks you're tossing in are gonna clog up that campfire. Additionally, this actor is acting on the side of the CP poster, and on the side of dissonance. Likely shill.
Also notice, that within about 12-24 hours there was much communication between BO/BV and anons, and BV ultimately scaled back to a reasonable position that satisfied a vast majority of anons arguing against censorship. These two actors seem to share a genuine common interest/goal, and were able to find compromise even through all the shilling.
If it weren't for the presence of the latter category of anons, the issue wouldn't exist any longer.
Tits or GTFO is shorthand for
>The fact that you are a female should have literally no relevance whatsoever in an anonymous gathering place of ideas. The fact that you mentioned that you were female in some way rather than speaking neutrally means that you feel it is important. And the only use anons have for a female that feels her gender is important is to show us her tits.