yep. this is exactly what i'm doing. lots of hey, why isn't this being reported leads to natural organically farmed redpills.
i feel that a blockchain style of mesh-trust-confirmation algorithm will be the next big thing in news/journalism.
watch for it. stories from anonymous peer-reviewed sources.
sound familiar?
you're soaking in it.
someone who doxxed themselves on purpose might have already known. we've seen a handful of those.
i'm telling you. avenatti is on the side of exposure. his location is not an accident.
np. i totally get where you're coming from, and i've been very careful to sort the wheat from the chaff.
sometimes a shared office space is just a shared office space, but with these two (i really wonder if they are directly related) they are involved in some way with at least some of the businesses they register, and at least are aware of the nature of many of the others.
people have, from time to time, stupidly put an email address in the reply form…look up a few lines from where you type your reply.
if that crumb was truly a hidden message, and Q was saying 'give me your email address and i'll send you a link' then some of the people we've 'yelled at' for putting an email address in the reply might have been doing it for this specific reason.
not yet. i've been busy doing other stuff today. some days i can dedicate to full deep-dive 'research' but today it's real work and semi-shitposting, following along.
ah. ding, that makes sense.
Q speaks in riddles.
someone observed this guy.
Q has that someone's picture.
this guy was near MA's office.
none of these three 'items' points to good or bad.
avenatti is trying to find out who he is, and implies he's muscle.
that implies violence.
that implies that it's not Q's guy.
this indicates that avenatti wants to signal he's on the same side as Q
but if he doesn't know who the guy is
and presumably Q does
then they aren't on the same team
but their teams are aligned in like directions.
i hope that makes sense. it's what i think we're supposed to take away.