>>2357836

This.

>>2298335

https://8ch.net/qresearch/res/2298164.html#2298335

>>2357892

False. Further division tactic. It isn't working.

>>2357941

What Q is getting at, is, the arsonist that started the Cali fires did so as per instruction from a higher up. We might get an extra indictment against him for his crimes. Crimes against the US.

Remember, the fires were started as a way to get around the DOJ's cock-blocking of CA's request for federal aid for their sanctuary cities. Once the DOJ to them to pound sand, the fires were set, and another plea was made to the Feds to get money.

They literally attacked Americans for funds for their illegal activities.

>>2358301

>18 posts by this ID

You are literally attacking everyone. You do realize we have IDs, right? It's not working, Chaim.

>>2357908

When Napolitano was head of the DHS, that's when the scandals broke out over prostitution within the USSS. They were literally trying to destroy these fine organizations from the inside out.

>>2357910

Pornography has nothing to do with free speech. It's two separate issues. Claiming that models posing nude for income and public consumption isn't pornography further cements that you have no idea how these two issues being conflated = a faulty comparison.

>>2357987

This. I'm not concerned with whether or not BO let's anons post tits; it's not even an issue whether it's allowed or not. What –is– and issue is how these jackoffs are going to get V& when the shit hits the fan.