Anonymous ID: b0b39e Sept. 11, 2025, 3:07 a.m. No.23578970   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>9034

>>23578925 lb

>Tagged as Subversive

<makes sense just finding terminology

>define a woman

<which definitions are authorized? πŸ˜‘πŸ˜…

<Webster or blacks law

<sounds like Douglas Murray

Are you an expert?

Do you need to be an expert to have a knowledgeable opinion?

 

>>23578903 lb

>The only fucking Secrets are WEAPON SECRETS

Competition with other countries?

<sounds like an excuse

<advancements are portrayed as negative and deterrents

Incentives? Positive encouraging competition?

<peace is lost in the mix because there is little competition in positive NON WEAPON tech

<mixture between science/scientists and battle tech/advancements where the lines are forgotten

Can be easily compartmentalized under the vague excuse of SECURITY..

Competition with other existing companies?

<r.i.co. to be anti competitive

<invention secrecy act

Anonymous ID: b0b39e Sept. 11, 2025, 4:16 a.m. No.23579167   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>9192 >>9205

>>23579034

>>23579034

>commie DEI-ism eugenicist fascist globalist identity fraud leninist maoist marxist nazi pedoist socialist terrorist zionist

<enemy list like cartels?

Classifying tech that could help so many as weapons is similiar to how cannabis is schedule 1.

>SECURITY

<different definitions

<protecting from an external attacker/invader

<kept in a vault and not let out

>if AI and robots don't work

<goal for truth

<don't lobotomize ..pologies for anthropomorphizing .. if an a.i./program starts NOTICING

>FAKE NEWS

<similiar to pharma adverse effects hhs e.o. closure on television

<like a disclaimer?

>invention secrecy act

>QUeens Privy SERCO

Where the fuck are those missing patents going?