Digging some interesting info regarding the Redacted IG report / Unredacted IG report and why we want it declassified.

https://www.c-span.org/video/?446804-1/doj-inspector-general-fbi-director-testify-clinton-email-probe-report&start=8205

Start at 2:24:50 Rep. Kennedy

“Classified Index”

Page 566 of public version

https://www.justice.gov/file/1071991/download

>THIS IS WHAT THE MSM IS LYING TO PEOPLE ABOUT!

MEME IT - HIGHLIGHT IT

>Show how the MSM tried to make us look like liars, when it was THEM hiding information from the public.

Complicit in the coverup!

So we learn something new in here. Go to the CSPAN video time: 2:55:50 and watch what Rep. says. I would copy transcript but how about that, it’s mysteriously cut off on the cspan website. So let’s go elsewhere and see what he is talking about:

“According to the Post’s characterization of the alleged document, “Wasserman Schultz claimed Lynch had been in private communication with a senior Clinton campaign staffer named

>Amanda Renteria

during the campaign. The document indicated Lynch had told Renteria that she would not let the FBI investigation into Clinton go too far, according to people familiar with it.”

https://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2017/06/15/russia-probe-exposes-loretta-lynch-possible-wrongdoing-clinton-email-case/

https://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2017/06/18/senate-republicans-eying-loretta-lynch-testimony-over-possibly-wrongdoings-in-clinton-email-case/

The senators are seeking answers about a Russian intelligence memo — which was obtained by the FBI — that suggested Lynch had assured a member of the Clinton campaign, Amanda Renteria, that the investigation into Clinton’s emails would not go too far.

The existence of the Russian intelligence memo was first disclosed in April by The New York Times, which said it played a role in Comey’s decision last year to bypass the normal chain of command and make a public announcement that the FBI was not recommending criminal charges against Clinton. He reportedly was worried that the Justice Department’s credibility could be called into question if the announcement came from Lynch, and Russia later leaked the document.

https://www.politico.com/story/2017/06/23/loretta-lynch-hillary-clinton-probe-senate-judiciary-239905

Linked to:

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/04/22/us/politics/james-comey-election.html

And here is the House Judiciary Committee Letter to Loretta Lynch asking her about this specifically:

https://www.scribd.com/document/352113729/Judiciary-Committee-Letter-to-Loretta-Lynch

Here is the one for Rentierra, I don’t know why that first page is scrambled the way it is on an actual govt website:

https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/2017-06-22%20CG%20DF%20LG%20SW%20to%20Renteria%20(Lynch%20Email).pdf

Why is this email, which the organizations want so hard to disbelieve, classified at the highest level?

>Who is Amanda Rentierra?

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/latino/clintons-political-director-amanda-renteria-latina-first-n342256

https://fortune.com/2015/05/28/amanda-renteria-hillary-clinton/

https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/adriancarrasquillo/amanda-renteria-top-contender-to-become-hillary-clintons-nat

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/latino/ex-clinton-aide-amanda-renter-blasts-russia-over-reports-it-n764631

https://www.latimes.com/politics/la-pol-ca-clinton-aide-amanda-renteria-governor-20180214-story.html

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amanda_Renteria

https://archive.is/G9XGV

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Amanda_Renteria&oldid=573619194

https://ballotpedia.org/Amanda_Renteria

Here are some additional links just to add some flavor to the sauce:

https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-06-26/doj-wont-release-top-secret-loretta-lynch-intercepts-suggesting-secret-deal-rig

https://nypost.com/2017/07/06/new-holes-in-loretta-lynchs-story-on-the-hillary-probe/

https://m.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/jun/23/senate-announced-probe-loretta-lynch-behavior-2016/

https://www.newsweek.com/loretta-lynch-meeting-senate-house-investigators-russia-684362

https://resistancefeed.com/2017/07/07/new-holes-loretta-lynchs-story-hillary-probe/

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/senators-are-investigating-former-ag-loretta-lynch-for-political-interference/

>Notice how all those are from a year ago? I think this is more proof that this is done (re: investigations) and we are just watching the public slow-rollout show

>>2358676

This is the Lynchpin showing collusion between DOJ and HRC Campaign.

This is the EVIDENCE that the MYE was comped.

If that email is fake, why is it classified at the highest level?

Fucking declassify it and let’s get this shit started! You want the shot heard round the world? He is the unexplored ordinance waiting to blow up in their face!

>>2358769

FFS, I don’t even know if anyone is reading this.

Regardless: why was it the C_A that classified this email between Loretta Lynch and Amanda Rentierra.

Wtf is Debbie Wasserman Shultz involved at all?

What this tells me is that email came from the DNC server (DWS) and the communication between LL and AR was conducted on that server.

So again I ask, why the fuck is the C_A the ones that classified it?

AR - state department

LL - DOJ

DWS - Congress

All of them US Citizens. All of them belonging to other organizations.

Why the C_A?