=Florida's 1987 Open Carry Ban, or which MANY people have been arrested and held at gunpoint, ruled unconstitutional.==

Of course it's unconstitutional. Open carry is 100% constitutionally protected and lawful in ALL 50 states, the states that claim it is illegal are violating the constitution, specifically the 2nd and 14th amendment, and their laws are void… period. ANYONE conspiring to deprive a right, or depriving a right under color of law, has violated the US Constitution, is an enemy to the Constitution, and belongs in prison.

>>23588203

Oops.

Florida's 1987 Open Carry Ban, or which MANY people have been arrested and held at gunpoint, ruled unconstitutional.

Of course it's unconstitutional. Open carry is 100% constitutionally protected and lawful in ALL 50 states, the states that claim it is illegal are violating the constitution, specifically the 2nd and 14th amendment, and their laws are void… period. ANYONE conspiring to deprive a right, or depriving a right under color of law, has violated the US Constitution, is an enemy to the Constitution, and belongs in prison.

>>23588249

Controlled opposition.

>>23588257

"Antifa" is controlled opposition so they can attribute "antifa" to those actually standing against fascism/tyranny.

>>23588261

They're telling you it was an OP, it's fake.

>>23588276

>GOOD VERSUS EVIL!!!

They want you divided.

>AND GOD IS ON OUR SIDE!!!

Question… Do you believe Jesus Christ has come in the flesh, that is us, the people?

>>23588323

>Anyone can or programmed to be a shooter

I wonder if the idiots calling for people to be fired for free speech understand that conspiracy against rights doesn't have to be under color of law?

>>23588375

He means assets playing parts.

>>23588377

>You can't kill a Christian

Do you realize how many call themselves Christian and reject Jesus?

Do you believe Jesus has come in the flesh, meaning us, the people?

>>23588382

We're not anonymous to those watching, only fellow anons.

>>23588414

It's important is what it is.

>>23588458

They know who we are. They let some know it.

>>23588471

For what?

Conspiracy against rights does not require it be under color of law, or by government, contrary to the "freedom of speech doesn't mean freedom of consequences" crowd that fell for the bait.

Conspiracy to intimidate people out of free speech is a crime.

>>23588477

Nah.

>>23588488

Not when employers are being contacted to punish people for exercising a right in a conspiracy to deprive rights.

You should read 18 USC 241

>>23588495

He meant after the op