>>23588516 LB
That literally has no bearing on what I said. You're concentrating on the firing, not the conspiracy BEHIND it.
People are literally conspiring to intimidate and deprive rights because they do not like that people have the freedom to say something they don't like, such as saying they're glad Charlie Kirk is dead. That is a federal crime under 18 USC 241.
>celebrating the murder of Charlie Kirk
Freedom of speech. Intimidating them such as threatening charges is a federal crime.
The identity or the man playing it?
You're gonna have a rough awakening if you can't accept these people are playing parts, they're ASSETS
Most Christians reject Jesus.
>We hold these truths to be self-evident: that all men arecreated
Asking Christians if they believe Jesus has come in the flesh, meaning us, is not picking a fight, it's testing the Spirit.
>i was serious!
I am also.
One mans vulgarity is anothers lyric.
TRUE threats are not, incitement is actually free speech, as people have the RIGHT to use force against an unlawful government, and defamation is a civil matter, not criminal.
I'm saying his killing that you saw is fake.
Watch the ring.
If nations are "women" then what did that symbolize?
Incitement would be what the founders did against the king.
It's free speech. If a cop for instance is unlawfully harming somoene, it's free speech to invite the crowd to stop him.
Was 9/11's "Lets roll!" incitement? Was it free speech?
>precedence
Sorry forgot to mention, I don't care what the lawless court says, they do not have that authority.
Seriously who told you idiots that the Judicial, Legislative, Executive, or all three together have authority to overRULE the constitutional limits placed on government?
So you weren't warned about coming deepfakes and FF's?
I bet you think Trumps shooting was real too.
Interesting question. Which holds highest authority, the constitution and federal code, or UCMJ?
>>23589338
>If you deny Jesus, you burn in hell
Do you deny Jesus has come in the flesh, meaning us? Do you deny Him in Kash Patel?
>Kash Patel is a self-professed Hindu. He refused to put his hand on the Bible, and instead was sworn into office, with his hand on Hindu's BagavadGita
So?
I'll repeat the question. Do you deny Jesus Christ come in the flesh, meaning us, the people?
Do you deny Him in Kash Patel?
Yet you refuse to answer the question and instead choose to project.
Do you deny Jesus come in the flesh, meaning us, the people? Do you deny Jesus in me?
It's an easy question.
What was that?