>>23592025 (pb) if you zoom you can actually see what looks like cord getting pulled??
The camera above him in the background is a remote controlled gun. The 'wire' behind Charlie is the entry wound blood spatter. He was hit from behind. When the remote was pressed, camera shoots, and also in another position in the crowd a small fire cracker kind of sound making device was also activated at the same time.
After the shooting the camera is missing. Either the camera was stolen because it's expensive, the owner took it down because it's expensive, or the person who put and removed the camera there is a remote controlled gun.
We either need that footage or find out who the camera belongs to and who installed it.
Yeah. Look how sketchy he appears looking around if anyone is watching before he takes it down. Who is this guy? I think he even uses the chair that Charlie was sitting in to get the camera. Talk about evidence tampering.
>The camera concept doesn't work for me because it can't explain the t-shirt lift or the movement of the lapel microphone
The kinetic energy of the bullet, and Charlie spasmed a bit upward from the shock. We need an autopsy report to know where the bullet entered. If it's the bounce off front plate theory then the bullet would have gone through his brain. If it hit from the back then the bullet must be somewhere in front of him. If we can get a high FPS camera footage and slow it down to see the bullet trace.
Bullet might've gone through the the spinal cord and all the nerves back there so the spasm seemed organic. Same way when some people get knocked out their hands stay up. Bullets travel at mach 3 so lots of kinetic energy too.
Just need a good quality uncompressed high frames per second camera footage from someone near front row and I can tell you in 5 minutes.