Anonymous ID: cf293e Sept. 13, 2025, 4:53 p.m. No.23596167   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>23596144

Yep. I've been writing by hand for a while now. Have a thing for fountain pens and bottled ink. It's all too unbelievable some of it. Could almost pass off as fiction some of it. Willing to bet not many paradigm shifts like this occur very often.

Anonymous ID: cf293e Sept. 13, 2025, 4:59 p.m. No.23596192   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>6202

>>23596175

>The past 8 years have been hell for Anon but wouldnโ€™t have it any other way.

Yeah, you never would have found someone you wanted to parasitize and accuse him of what you do, seeing as you don't post merchants or your other template faggotry anymore. I wouldn't have it anyway either, because it wasn't a meme that I consider a symbol to profit off of that was my downfall in his desperate attempt to protect the hive.

Anonymous ID: cf293e Sept. 13, 2025, 5:19 p.m. No.23596328   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>6347

I mean, I don't mind that a weak man behaving as evil incarnate, or using a bot or AI to accomplish the same, has been saying it's me for years. I'm not the one that had a psychotic break after being ridiculed for having weak memes and stupid narratives. The toddler strategy from the flat brain was the only move he had I guess.

Anonymous ID: cf293e Sept. 13, 2025, 5:25 p.m. No.23596356   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>23596347

No, I'm not the obsessed one. I'm commenting on him, watching his psychotic behavior. Insanely obsessed individual that should never again do to another human being what he's been doing for quite some time now.

Anonymous ID: cf293e Sept. 13, 2025, 5:34 p.m. No.23596414   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>23596402

Waitโ€ฆ was Hogg their attempt at countering Charlie like Greta was their attempt at countering weaponized autism? Wouldn't that be hilarious. They're always trying to find "their own version" of what's popular on the other side of the aisle.

Anonymous ID: cf293e Sept. 13, 2025, 5:39 p.m. No.23596447   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>6486

Went from battle of ideas to spiritual battle real quick. didn't it? Always kind of was the latter, but now it feels more prominent. It appears they have no ideas left to battle with anyway that anyone hasn't already seen a million times and all the logical fallacies and holes in reason they contain. Well, I think I know what I'm doing, KEK!

Anonymous ID: cf293e Sept. 13, 2025, 6:21 p.m. No.23596655   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>6683

>>23596642

>So you speak for all anons? Or just Kirk fanboys?

No, I speak for myself, and I was speaking directly to you, the ID I'm currently replying to. Don't you find it odd that it wasn't obvious and you required me to explain that to you? If you're playing a little troll game then you're about to get scorched.

>Fucking weak minded fag. You donโ€™t know shit about Charlie.

I appreciate the honesty in your projection.

> Only his tik tok moments

I don't watch TikTok videos unless they're posted here by someone else.

>Get your booster to save the lives around you.

I could make a joke about you having preferred pronouns but I'm giving up the trash talk.

Anonymous ID: cf293e Sept. 13, 2025, 6:30 p.m. No.23596690   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>23596667

They're seeing not just two individuals but the strengths of the ideologies in play as well. One needs communal policing of thoughts and emotions and excludes anyone else that doesn't follow the same doctrine, even going so far as to making public statements of murder and examples of anyone who disagrees with it or dismantles the illusion of logic it has. The other side sees it a bit more reasonably for everyone.