Anonymous ID: 37987a Sept. 15, 2025, 11:20 p.m. No.23607826   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7832

>>23607822

>The earth is round

did you mayhaps perchance mean SPHERICAL?

>and made of particle waveforms

nothing is more convicing of stupidty than an attempt to speak of concepts that one CLEARLY does not understand

Anonymous ID: 37987a Sept. 15, 2025, 11:24 p.m. No.23607834   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>23607829

>Just put the word quantum in front of it so people nod their heads and walk away slowly without asking questions

if you know who Richard Feynman was, you'll have added appreciation for his quote,

"I think it's safe to say NO ONE understands quantum mechanics."

Anonymous ID: 37987a Sept. 15, 2025, 11:34 p.m. No.23607854   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7860 >>7866

>>23607832

>point-states

more technobabble jargonspeak gibberish

 

>your teacher is as ignorant as you.

i WAS a professor, and an author

 

>Einstein was a Khazarian agent feeding false physics concepts to keep mankind earthbound.

i never suggested einstein was anything else

YOU, on the other hand, are a pretentious ASS

i can explain exactly where einstein made a mathematical error and WHY relativity is flawed

can you?

that's what i thought

stay in your lane, CHILD

stop trying to put your word in others' mouths and believing you know a person based on a few lines of text

Anonymous ID: 37987a Sept. 15, 2025, 11:40 p.m. No.23607862   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>23607860

>How far are you on that time machine, genius?

and there it is…

unable to defend an indefensible action

deflect and switch tactics to sophomoric insults

 

still waiting to hear your explanation of WHY relativity is flawed…

or did you just MINDLESSLY take the word of a total stranger, bcs it was what you WANTED to BELIEVE

Anonymous ID: 37987a Sept. 16, 2025, 12:17 a.m. No.23607917   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>23607891

>more practical to build something to power my lights

cold fusion, solid-oxide-fuel-cells (BloomBox), burning plastic in power plants (like china's been doing for the past decade), are just a few suggestions

>or make a car lighter and faster

no one needs lighter and faster cars

what's needed is more fuel efficiency

on average, 99.7% of the energy stored in "gasoline" is lost as unrecovered waste heat

you read right, your car's engine is 0.3% efficient

if someone could increase that to just 3% efficient, it would increase miles per gallon by a factor of ten

that would be 380mpg compared to the 38mpg i get in my 2005 4-cyl camry

does 3% efficiency sound like an unattainable goal to you?

look up Pogue carburator (vaporizing carburator), water injection, 6-stroke engines, just to name a few