>The earth is round
did you mayhaps perchance mean SPHERICAL?
>and made of particle waveforms
nothing is more convicing of stupidty than an attempt to speak of concepts that one CLEARLY does not understand
>The earth is round
did you mayhaps perchance mean SPHERICAL?
>and made of particle waveforms
nothing is more convicing of stupidty than an attempt to speak of concepts that one CLEARLY does not understand
>Just put the word quantum in front of it so people nod their heads and walk away slowly without asking questions
if you know who Richard Feynman was, you'll have added appreciation for his quote,
"I think it's safe to say NO ONE understands quantum mechanics."
>point-states
more technobabble jargonspeak gibberish
>your teacher is as ignorant as you.
i WAS a professor, and an author
>Einstein was a Khazarian agent feeding false physics concepts to keep mankind earthbound.
i never suggested einstein was anything else
YOU, on the other hand, are a pretentious ASS
i can explain exactly where einstein made a mathematical error and WHY relativity is flawed
can you?
that's what i thought
stay in your lane, CHILD
stop trying to put your word in others' mouths and believing you know a person based on a few lines of text
>How far are you on that time machine, genius?
and there it is…
unable to defend an indefensible action
deflect and switch tactics to sophomoric insults
still waiting to hear your explanation of WHY relativity is flawed…
or did you just MINDLESSLY take the word of a total stranger, bcs it was what you WANTED to BELIEVE
>Now do "My Sharona"
>more practical to build something to power my lights
cold fusion, solid-oxide-fuel-cells (BloomBox), burning plastic in power plants (like china's been doing for the past decade), are just a few suggestions
>or make a car lighter and faster
no one needs lighter and faster cars
what's needed is more fuel efficiency
on average, 99.7% of the energy stored in "gasoline" is lost as unrecovered waste heat
you read right, your car's engine is 0.3% efficient
if someone could increase that to just 3% efficient, it would increase miles per gallon by a factor of ten
that would be 380mpg compared to the 38mpg i get in my 2005 4-cyl camry
does 3% efficiency sound like an unattainable goal to you?
look up Pogue carburator (vaporizing carburator), water injection, 6-stroke engines, just to name a few