I would like to debate the most ardent Trump supporter/Q reader.
Please let me know if any of you are up to the challenge.
Idk I guess anything is possible. That said, the topic of this >>23628310
debate will be whether or not Donald Trump should be impeached for dereliction of duty. My position is that he should be.
Please see above.
>why should Donald Trump be impeached for dereliction of duty?
Well, in part for the point >>23628334 made (inadvertently it would seem).
Argument from incredulity.
>President Trump isn't the only person in Government, anon.
I am aware of that.
>your fetish with bogus charges against him is a tired ploy.
It’s incorrect to assume I have a fetish for charges against Trump. I know full well the charges against him were political in nature and lacked standing.
>It failed twice, it would fail thrice.
I’m not saying it would pass in the house or senate. In fact, it probably wouldn’t, since my calls for his impeachment are based on his inability to hold the congress (among others) accountable for their crimes
.
>Schiff, on the other hand, seems to have been lying the whole time and in Congress. Plus, he colluded with foreigners (the Viindmans) who are cartel agents (from the elite Urkraine slaver tribe that keeps Ukraine in slavery) to slander President Trump. Schiff a congenital liar, as well.
I am also very aware of this. Which is why his AG should have indicted him. But she hasn’t. And he hasn’t held her accountable for that, hence, why he should be impeached for dereliction of duty.
Thank you.
>you’re not allowed to defend yourself when someone mischaracterizes you!
Yes I am. And I did. While reinforcing my position with objective truths, mind you.
Maybe sit this one out?
>not a single one of you has landed a punch on this anon
That’s because my position is the correct one. Americans have been conditioned to believe the swamp can operate with impunity, when the truth is, the forces that COULD hold them accountable simply don’t care to. Donald Trump, as President, is obligated to defend our constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic. And his inability to do that puts all of our lives at risk. Hence: Dereliction of duty. An open and shut case if there ever was one.