>>2363111 (Q, lb)

I really hope that the Hanks thing isn't bullshit only because that's the example that they're holding to… and I don't believe Q's ever mentioned or confirmed Hanks (or, uh, Hanx… his creepy AF photographer alter ego).

>>2364068

That was my thought as well… they're hanging a ton of it on the Hanks thing, but Q has never mentioned it. Seems like an attempt to set-up the equation that if Hanks = not true, than so does Q.

>>2364084

>>>2364118 >>2364343 >>2364361

There is enough sauce to give Hanks/x a decent creep factor… but, yeah… I also feel like there's too much noise.