Anonymous ID: 11f3f9 Sept. 24, 2025, 5:02 a.m. No.23646847   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6848 >>6850 >>6875

Morning anons…

 

Board seems to be under heavy attack…

 

Recall theEXPLODING PAGERS?????

 

This guy's analysis of theKIRK ASSASINATIONis on the money.

 

https://x.com/jonaaronbray/status/1970812334915379678

 

Jon Bray

@jonaaronbray

·

9m

### Breaking: My Vector Mapping Analysis Exposes the Bullet Lie in Charlie Kirk's Assassination

 

Folks, I've crunched the numbers—literally. Using advanced pixel flow vector mapping on three distinct angles of high-res footage from the Sept 10 UVU event, I've traced every energy signature in the chaos. Zero. Nada. Not a single linear kinetic vector consistent with a supersonic .30-06 round impacting flesh, fabric, or air. This isn't sloppy journalism; it's forensic-grade pixel forensics screaming that the "bullet stopped by his steel-like bones" narrative is a fairy tale. Charlie was a fighter, sure—but dense bones don't defy physics. Let's unpack why this "recovered slug under the skin" story crumbles under scrutiny, especially when paired with the explosive mic theory that's holding up like a champ.

Anonymous ID: 11f3f9 Sept. 24, 2025, 5:02 a.m. No.23646848   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6850 >>6852 >>6856 >>6875 >>6905

>>23646847

  1. No Impact Energy Signatures on Multi-Angle Footage: In ballistic events, a high-velocity round (2,700+ fps for .30-06) creates a telltale "shock plume"—a directional pixel displacement from the hypersonic entry, cavitation bubble in tissue, and exit yaw. I mapped vectors across 4K clips: pre-shot baseline, impact frame, and 5-second aftermath. Result? Omnidirectional micro-vibrations radiating from Charlie's chest (mic position), not a straight-line pierce. It's blast overpressure, folks—spherical expansion from an internal source, like a triggered charge in the RØDE Wireless PRO. If it was a bullet, my flow maps would've lit up like a tracer round. They didn't.

 

  1. The "Man of Steel" Bullet Claim Defies Ballistics: Officials say a .30-06 was "stopped under his skin" due to "dense bones." Heroic spin, but laughable science. At that velocity, even Superman's ribcage fragments the projectile into hydrostatic chaos—tissue explosion, not a neat subcutaneous park. Autopsy leaks? Silent on rifling marks, copper jacketing, or yaw deformation. And recovering an intact slug from a long-range hit? Unicorn territory. This smells like planted evidence to distract from the real killer: a remote-detonated device synced to that audible "shot" as the trigger signal.

Anonymous ID: 11f3f9 Sept. 24, 2025, 5:04 a.m. No.23646850   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6875 >>7080

>>23646847

>>23646848

 

Jon Bray

@jonaaronbray

·

35m

### Breaking: My Vector Mapping Analysis Exposes the Bullet Lie in Charlie Kirk's Assassination

 

Folks, I've crunched the numbers—literally. Using advanced pixel flow vector mapping on three distinct angles of high-res footage from the Sept 10 UVU event, I've traced every energy signature in the chaos. Zero. Nada. Not a single linear kinetic vector consistent with a supersonic .30-06 round impacting flesh, fabric, or air. This isn't sloppy journalism; it's forensic-grade pixel forensics screaming that the "bullet stopped by his steel-like bones" narrative is a fairy tale. Charlie was a fighter, sure—but dense bones don't defy physics. Let's unpack why this "recovered slug under the skin" story crumbles under scrutiny, especially when paired with the explosive mic theory that's holding up like a champ.

 

  1. No Impact Energy Signatures on Multi-Angle Footage: In ballistic events, a high-velocity round (2,700+ fps for .30-06) creates a telltale "shock plume"—a directional pixel displacement from the hypersonic entry, cavitation bubble in tissue, and exit yaw. I mapped vectors across 4K clips: pre-shot baseline, impact frame, and 5-second aftermath. Result? Omnidirectional micro-vibrations radiating from Charlie's chest (mic position), not a straight-line pierce. It's blast overpressure, folks—spherical expansion from an internal source, like a triggered charge in the RØDE Wireless PRO. If it was a bullet, my flow maps would've lit up like a tracer round. They didn't.

 

  1. The "Man of Steel" Bullet Claim Defies Ballistics: Officials say a .30-06 was "stopped under his skin" due to "dense bones." Heroic spin, but laughable science. At that velocity, even Superman's ribcage fragments the projectile into hydrostatic chaos—tissue explosion, not a neat subcutaneous park. Autopsy leaks? Silent on rifling marks, copper jacketing, or yaw deformation. And recovering an intact slug from a long-range hit? Unicorn territory. This smells like planted evidence to distract from the real killer: a remote-detonated device synced to that audible "shot" as the trigger signal.

 

  1. Acoustic Trigger Ties It All Together: Here's the smoking gun (pun intended)—that rifle crack wasn't the murder weapon; it was the detonator. Supersonic booms carry modulated frequencies; a compact explosive in the mic could've been rigged to activate on a specific acoustic signature, masking the real blast as "gunfire." If Tyler Robinson fired from afar, where's the bullet's flight path in the vectors? Absent. This was layered opsec—fake the shot to cue the boom.

 

Charlie's death wasn't a lone-wolf sniper hit; it was engineered precision, with the bullet story as the shiny red herring. Demand raw footage dumps, independent ballistics review, and those autopsy vectors. If my pixel maps are wrong, release the data—prove it. But deep down, we know: the truth isn't buried; it's exploding into view.

 

Who's running their own analysis? Share your frames below. Let's vector this conspiracy straight to hell. #CharlieKirkAssassination #PixelForensics #AcousticTrigger #UVUTruth

Anonymous ID: 11f3f9 Sept. 24, 2025, 5:05 a.m. No.23646852   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>23646848

based on the analysis I completely agree anon.

 

Does anyone know if they are admitting they have a bullet? I have not seen that ANYWHERE. I have seen the "no exit wound"…