Saw a good Snake Eyes analysis last night.
Hard to watch that movie and believe that CK is dead…rather than in Valhalla, kek. I'd go further and suggest that's not even his real name.
Anyway, this whole thing has been a very good op for breaking apart the community. People's analysis are all over the place. Some I've followed who have been really on point for years are pushing ignorant or uneducated theories. I do question the motives of some in the light, e.g. TP pushing for the miracle theory, aka sainthood. I don't question anon patriotism though, but I do think there is a lack of first principals thinking, e.g. the exploding mic/pager theory. The video frame rate and the zoom sucks. Moreover, these videos get processed by platforms. In that specific video, what looks like a puff of smoke is much more likely a set of ghost pixels, which are where an object was, the shirt, but has quickly moved out of the way. It comes off as looking like a puff but is more likely the shirt in transition, hence the transparency. That's the type of artifact that gets produced with zoomed in, low rate cell phone cameras. Just saying. That's not even to say that it wasn't an exploding mic, but merely that the camera is not capturing that. Not against all the analysis, but the delay in the anon community to come to a smaller set of possibilities has been proof that this was a master op. Let's get back to first principals, #1 of which is that it is OK not to know or conclude anything yet.