>>2365614 (lb)

I believe this is evidence that the original Q image is a shoop. The signature in Q's photo is not showing perspective distortion relative to the overlaid image of POTUS's signature. Furthermore, looking closely at the signature in Q's original photo I fail to find any overlapping ink as should be expected if the signature were organic. Ink is laid down as the signature is drawn by the hand holding the pen, and that ink overlaps as the lines of the signature cross. Those overlaps should be darker, but the signature is uniform.

These characteristics are similar to the father's signature on Hussein's birth certificate, coincidentally (!).

I believe this may be a raging clue. Q would not pass off a fake photo without a good reason. We must find the original signature that matches Q's photo and POTUS's video.

Then again, there is also this:

>>2365604

There are definitely subtle differences. Maybe we're chasing our tails and POTUS's signatures are as consistent as his policy stances. But examining Q's photo leads me to believe the signature pictured is not organic.