Anonymous ID: fa8cca Sept. 27, 2025, 3:33 p.m. No.23663782   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>3798

>>23663769

 

Luke 21: 20-24

20 โ€œWhen you see Jerusalem being surrounded by armies, you will know that its desolation is near. 21 Then let those who are in Judea flee to the mountains, let those in the city get out, and let those in the country not enter the city. 22 For this is the time of punishment in fulfillment of all that has been written. 23 How dreadful it will be in those days for pregnant women and nursing mothers! There will be great distress in the land and wrath against this people. 24 They will fall by the sword and will be taken as prisoners to all the nations. Jerusalem will be trampled on by the Gentiles until the times of the Gentiles are fulfilled.

Anonymous ID: fa8cca Sept. 27, 2025, 5:15 p.m. No.23664123   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>4130 >>4141 >>4143 >>4169 >>4182

>>23664111

+5

No, Castle Doctrine does not typically apply to pets because it's designed to protect human life and the sanctity of one's home, and pets are generally considered property. While you can use reasonable force to protect a pet from harm, you cannot use deadly force under Castle Doctrine to defend property, including a pet, except in Texas at night under specific circumstances. You can, however, use the defense of necessity to justify using force if it's the only way to prevent a greater harm to yourself or others.