>>23664489 (pb)
anon, you like to squabble. I do not.
I have spent a lot of time learning and it's not an easy task.
I've found, for the most part, that 'free mason' or 'simthsonian' history is usually fake and incomplete.
Histories of the Americas ignore most of what happened and the 'natives' prohibit any study of the DNA of bodies, so much of it is fake.
they pretend that a 10000 year old body is their 'ancestor' and you and I can agree, can't we, that's gotta be bunk.
Most of the history of North America north of Mexico is suppressed.
the narrative of 'they stole our land' is fake.
the narrative of 'tainted blankets' is fake (only one case of it)
There is a total suppression of the precolonial situation in the North East, and the voyages of the Vickings are suppressed.
AS far as European History goes: you can learn it on your own if you take the time going back many thousands of years.