Anonymous ID: 5b7d94 Sept. 29, 2025, 5:24 p.m. No.23673438   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>3561

You know, I just realized something on the way back to the keyboard, about something one of the mimics said last night. That I have a cognitive impairment because I don't project. Apparently to the paid to post deep state lackeys it's a disability to not accuse your opponent of that which you are guilty of. I don't accuse what I'm guilty of onto a shill, I confess what I'm guilty of before God. Not surprising they would want that for themselves too, they've been parasitizing everything for a couple years now seeing as they have no ideas or logic left to battle with.

Anonymous ID: 5b7d94 Sept. 29, 2025, 6:17 p.m. No.23673699   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>23673614

Are you doomfagging again, AEI? With a slight dusting of demoralization too I see. Were you ever good at that, because I'm still waiting to be demoralized. Creating fantasy for demoralization only works on a compliant hive, not a community of free thinkers. I just have to talk about shill behavior to demoralize them and piss them off, they don't like it when their lies and hypocrisy are highlighted.

Anonymous ID: 5b7d94 Sept. 29, 2025, 6:45 p.m. No.23673803   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>3849

>>23673751

Easton is the highest ranking anon. There's no dispute on that. Really was a kind thing whoever it was that nominated him that night to be the highest ranking anon. I used to do a tongue-in-cheek response to people asking for Q years back, like I was an answering machine, telling the person to leave the question with the highest ranking anon. The mimics act like I was referring to myself.

Anonymous ID: 5b7d94 Sept. 29, 2025, 6:55 p.m. No.23673841   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>4179

Looks like they're focusing on the religious group rather than the individual. Come on, shills, the mighty behavior you decided to engage in, what is considered a crime when done in public, has failed and is now just behavior to be ridiculed. Kicked all the shills and made them cry and now they don't want to play with me anymore, they just want to steal from me like parasites.

Anonymous ID: 5b7d94 Sept. 29, 2025, 7:31 p.m. No.23674040   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>23673985

Didn't even know they had a new release of it. I thought the DOS version that SSI put out in the 90s was the last official one. Might have to pick that one up, but it'll probably sit unplayed. Videogames just don't have the appeal to me like they used to. I'd rather wargame with miniature pieces of plastic I glued together and painted, using a measuring tape and firing templates and rolling dice for randomness and a book of rules refined over decades, or play a board game, or card game than videogames these days.

Anonymous ID: 5b7d94 Sept. 29, 2025, 8:04 p.m. No.23674204   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>23674179

>I think there is a possibility that a religion can become corrupted by the actions of an individual.

Infiltration to corrupt is not limited to just religion.

>If one individual behaves in a cult-like manner, and then another person does the same, and so on and so forth, won't it eventually become a cult?

Monkey see monkey do doesn't make a cult. You'd have to call TikTok content creators a cult then.

Anonymous ID: 5b7d94 Sept. 29, 2025, 8:16 p.m. No.23674255   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>4258

>>23674228

>Well, I guess you could define it as a cult movement if it involves blind worship and behavior like that.

Cults are also dogmatic, with charismatic leadership often times exploiting the cultists emotionally and/or physically for their own ends..