>>2369189

> ~~hi, I've been lied to the most!~~ Catholicanon here

1) The Pope is fake and gay.

2) All bibles are archetypes at best. If you want a closer version of what the documents originally were, learn Greek/Latin, or better yet learn Sumerian. The RCC State (yes, Rome is a special city like London and D.C.) fucked over the canon hard.

3) It doesn't change the fact that the archetype, for the most part, is correct. Words matter. Context matters.

4) You can pray directly to God in your own Temple (body). Stop paying the Church heads in Rome, they are all Satanists..

You're welcome.

-ex catholic

#walkaway

>>2369284

>it'll be to east orthodoxy

The Church of James the Just? Solid choice. Much closer to what was originally intended.

Which is the exact reason it's a hole in the wall church in Jerusalem, vs what became of its twin (ie- the RCC)

>>2369286

The first "bible" was a collection of scrolls. Saul only "wrote" one Gospel.

The theories of where the Gospels originate from are interesting reads; It's why I've come to view them all as archetypes, and nothing more.

>>2369316

>Saul only "wrote" one Gospel

Correction, Saul/Paul did not write any Gospels. he wrote the Pauline epistles.

So there's that, re: Paul = comped. ;)

>>2369333

I caught myself, shadilay! → >>2369332

>>2369341

AI you say? Are you aware of the research from December 2017?

The current bots are not as good as the AI was.

It was very hard to discern the AI from a human; Almost indistinguishable. Anons that were here in Dec understand that we were fighting an uphill battle (before the NSA took the Dwarves away from the CIA).

Just saying. Here, have an infographic from then: