Domestic Enemy to the Constitution of the United States unlawfully detains man for verbally opposing and challenging his actions of unlawfully searching a man. Cop also tells him to shut his mouth.

The US Supreme Court said in 1987 in their 8-1 majority opinion in City of Houston v Hill that the "freedom of individuals verbally to oppose or challenge police action without thereby risking arrest is a principle characteristic from which we determine a free nation from a police state".

Detaining him and threatening arrest for such is a violation of his 1st and 4th amendment rights. The order to "get back" was unlawful and served no legitimate purpose but to infringe upon the mans right to oppose and record his actions. Arizona tried setting a minimum distance in law of just 8 feet and it was ruled unconstitutional as it served no legitimate purpose.

Any police officer telling someone to "shut your mouth" or similar is a violation of the 1st amendment. It is meant to intimidate someone into ceding their 1st amendment right to speak, which no officer has the right to demand.

>>23693835

>dispersal order

>>23693840

>Chicago has the most armed criminals in the entire republic.

They have the most cops?

>>23693924

>>23694005

You mean because agitators cause chaos so government can declare it unlawful? Remember when Q told us they have people in every organization?

>>23694024

They are the largest armed criminal gang in the country.

>>23694066

Perhaps the cops and the agitators are on the same team to quell protest and get lawful assembly declared unlawful.

>>23694327

>nationalism vs. globalism

National…

>>23694374

>no real christians here

Do you believe Jesus Christ has come in the flesh, meaning us?

>>23694383

No, it isn't. Please answer the question.

>>23694391

I've been doing this a lot longer than reddit existed. Seems to me you want to accuse, but you aren't actually Christian.

>>23694396

No it's not. I AM the authority on how I write. I do not take orders, and I don't care what YOU call how I write.

A Christian has no problem answering the question.

Domestic Enemy to the Constitution of the United States demands man explain what he's doing and give his name/ID, for simply recording a bank from public which is not only 100% lawful but constitutionally protected. No RAS of any crime whatsoever, just a cop blatantly violating rights, constitution, and law.

Deprivation of rights under color of law IS A FEDERAL CRIME.

>>23694493

Read it again. The bible says Jesus is in US. Those who deny that are antiChrist.

>>23694500

>That would be conspiracy against rights and deprivation of rights under color of law. So when is the arrest?

>>23694501

>>23694493

You should also note, Jesus said "Many will come in my name saying I am the Christ and will deceive many"

>>23694512

It's sad to see people chomping at the bit to deprive rights.

>>23694516

Boot licking Karens.

>>23694519

https://www.foxnews.com/us/trumps-war-ravaged-portland-national-guard-deployment-halted-federal-judge-over-authority-concerns

Bout time.

>>23694537

American cops born here have been terrorizing people and violating our constitution for a long time, you're just noticing the muslims.

>>23694543

Except he doesn't actually have that authority.

Why do you want a king with ultimate authority? You should read your bible, God was pissed about that.

Remember, this is about returning power to the people…. not government, or one man.

>>23694547

It's not actually hyperbole, unfortunately many (not saying you) really really want a king. What many don't understand is a king does not just mean a man, a group in power can also be a king. Where the Spirit of the Lord is, there is liberty.

>>23694551

What nonsense are you accusing me of now? What did I supposedly not respond to?

>>23694560

Something I said? kek

No kings, be it a man, or a group.

>>23694568

No a king doesn't just mean one person… ask a mason.

I mean a king, and a group can be king.

>>23694570

And a lot of what's called "Gods ways" isn't.

Remember, they put a crown of thorns on His head.

>>23694568

>Christ is King

Where the Spirit of the Lord is, there is liberty. He is king of Kings and Lord of lords…. but are you a king or a lord? He called us family, His mother, brothers, and sisters. He did not call us subjects.

>>23694582

No it doesn't, and you're not the ruler of language.

Women has another meaning, remember "daughter Israel"? Who does Mary symbolize? What is a country? Where did the derogatory term "cunt" come from for women? What was meant by "among those born to women none have arisen greater than John"?

Why do you want a king? King of kings and Lord of lords, but are you a king or a lord? Where the Spirit of the Lord is there is liberty. He calls us family, not subjects. On this I am quite clear.

>>23694592

You call it that. It's called a king.

Groups can be men and women. Aren't you supposed to be learning the symbolism and comms?

>>23694592

>Don’t like it elect other people

Until the elections are rigged and the will of the people is not followed. Then We the People have the constitutionally protected RIGHT to throw off government, and institute new government.

>>23694594

>The deceiver likes to try to convince us we are Gods

>>23694597

What do you think it means to believe in Jesus? Whatever you do for the least of these you do for Him. Whatever you do not do for the least of these you do not do for Him. If you reject the least of these…. you reject Him. Many claim to love Him and believe in Him and then outright reject Him.

>>23694600

Burning a flag is constitutionally protected free speech/expression. Someone is free to burn a flag they own.

>>23694616

I'm not interrogating your belief, I asked a question. Why do you accuse over a question?

Many come in His name and deceive many.

>>23694624

Yes it is, and our rights are above any EO.

You're about to learn the hard way what returning power to the people means.

>>23694624

>Our great American Flag is the most sacred and cherishedsymbol

>>23694635

Perhaps it's meaningless to you.

>>23694650

KMAO do you know what conspiracy against rights and deprivation of rights under color of law is? You're citing what they can be charged with, while it's been made clear it's about the symbolism of the flag and "respect" of it. Look at the EO.

Using the color of law, ANY LAW, to deprive a right is a crime. Two or more people planning it is a conspiracy.

Depr

>>23694654

The funny thing is, one person can hear and see one thing, while another hears and sees something different, while both can be true. It's called perspective. Some think their perspective is the only perspective.

I've told the Truth.

>>23694667

It's expression, and again it's been made clear it's about the "respect" for the flag.

Have you not realized Trump is violating the constitution on purpose yet? What did you think returning power to the people meant?

>>23694670

I've been posting here for years kek. Since before the end of CBTS.

>>23694684

Enjoy your awakening.

>>23694687

What, do you really expect one government agency to fight another?