Anonymous ID: 06a234 Oct. 5, 2025, 7:27 p.m. No.23698355   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8374 >>8380 >>8539 >>8818 >>8863 >>8895

yle Cheney

@kyledcheney

UPDATE: Hegseth today called up 400 members of the Texas National Guard, with Gov. Abbott's apparent permission, to be deployed "where needed, including in the cities of Portland and Chicago."

 

https://x.com/kyledcheney/status/1975019706374586377

Anonymous ID: 06a234 Oct. 5, 2025, 7:40 p.m. No.23698380   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8382 >>8539 >>8818 >>8863 >>8895

>>23698355

 

Greg Abbott

@GregAbbott_TX

I fully authorized the President to call up 400 members of the Texas National Guard to ensure safety for federal officials.

 

You can either fully enforce protection for federal employees or get out of the way and let Texas Guard do it.

 

No Guard can match the training, skill, and expertise of the Texas National Guard.

 

They defend our country with pride.

 

America must also know that Texas still has thousands of National Guard assisting with the Border security.

10:37 PM · Oct 5, 2025

·

2,164

Views

https://x.com/GregAbbott_TX/status/1975027635295007073

Anonymous ID: 06a234 Oct. 5, 2025, 7:58 p.m. No.23698405   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8539 >>8818 >>8863 >>8895

@MrAndyNgo

Mark Bray

@Mark__Bray

, a financier of international Antifa and the author of the Antifa Handbook, has announced he is fleeing to Europe (believed to be Spain). The announcement follows the U.S. government declaring Antifa domestic terrorists, and the intelligence community looking to establish the international links to declare international Antifa as a foreign terrorist organization.

 

Without evidence, Bray says the reason is because of "death threats + doxing." Bray is one of the major financiers of the International Antifa Defence Fund, which also announced that it was shutting down to relocate its operations abroad in an attempt to escape U.S. prosecution.

 

@RutgersU

employs the violent extremist advocate as an assistant teaching professor. He previously taught at Dartmouth and earned a rare rebuke for his advocacy of Antifa political violence. Antifa believe in maiming and killing targets branded as "fascists" to further their terrorist cause.

 

https://x.com/MrAndyNgo/status/1975030928700240170

Anonymous ID: 06a234 Oct. 5, 2025, 8:08 p.m. No.23698442   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8450 >>8452 >>8469 >>8485

Margo has the full play by play on Twitter of the current hearing from the Judge in Oregon who called an emergency hearing after the CA guard has been activated to be sent to Oregon.

 

https://x.com/ProfMJCleveland/status/1975023266952839556

Anonymous ID: 06a234 Oct. 5, 2025, 8:22 p.m. No.23698485   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8491

>>23698442

Post

 

See new posts

Conversation

Margot Cleveland

@ProfMJCleveland

·

57m

3/

Margot Cleveland

@ProfMJCleveland

·

36m

4/ Sounds like it is ready to start momentarily. Will live-post the hearing.

Margot Cleveland

@ProfMJCleveland

·

30m

5/ California is in this case too now. Eric Hamilton is handling for DOJ.

Margot Cleveland

@ProfMJCleveland

·

29m

6/ Judge: Understand Trump has brought Cal. National Guard to Oregon, sounds like Texas National Guard will be deployed to Oregon or Illinois too.

Margot Cleveland

@ProfMJCleveland

·

28m

7/ DOJ: Relocation of 200 National Guard have been or will be relocated. 100 federalized in LA. Relocation is consistent with Trump's order of 6/7/2025. Judge: How is that not in direct violation of yesterday's TRO.

Margot Cleveland

@ProfMJCleveland

·

26m

8/ DOJ: TRO said Oregon can't be federalized. Judge: Aren't you circumventing my order? DOJ: That Presidential memorandum that are reasonably necessary to protect federal property. Any state may be called upon to whether the situation is.

Margot Cleveland

@ProfMJCleveland

·

24m

  1. Judge: You are missing the point. The conditions on the ground in Portland that was basis of my TRO. What is basis that they can be diverted, where no showing that you needed military force.

DOJ: There is little precedent.

Margot Cleveland

@ProfMJCleveland

·

21m

10/ Judge: You need to have a colorable basis that federalize.

DOJ: No knew guardsmen were federalized.

Judge: As an officer of the court, do you believe this is an appropriate way to deal with an order.

DOJ: I'm not a policy maker, this is not a violation of TRO. No standing

Show more

Margot Cleveland

@ProfMJCleveland

·

18m

11/ Plaintiff: Notes impending transfer of Texas National Guard transfer, and points to Judge saying no basis to federalize, which turns to California national guard and then we see memo with federalizing of Texas National Guard, now need prevent this "gamesmanship" to prevent

Show more

Margot Cleveland

@ProfMJCleveland

·

17m

12/ In other words, couldn't Texas send National Guard to Portland without it being federalized.

Margot Cleveland

@ProfMJCleveland

·

16m

13/ Me: Trump continues to do what I said he is wisely doing. Obey the letter of the injunction and nothing more. Me more: I can't believe Dems are fighting to keep law and order from coming to chaotic cities.

Margot Cleveland

@ProfMJCleveland

·

8m

14/ Judge: For all reasons stated in prior order, for TRO, grant second motion for TRO, originally I saw it as only California National Guard, but it seems based on conduct defendants and Texas, I see those as direct contravention of order I ordered yesterday, so I'm granting

Show more

Margot Cleveland

@ProfMJCleveland

15/ Plaintiff: Appropriate to issue a second order with broader scope to incorporate reasoning, "exploited" b/c TRO limited to Oregon, so we want to prohibit stay federalized members of any national guards of any state or district of columbia. Judge: That's what I will do, I will enter a new TRO prohibiting relocation of federalization, within state of Oregon.

 

16/ Judge: Same reasoning applies, and entering order barring any federalized national guard. Denying motion for stay and administrative stay.

11:20 PM · Oct 5, 2025

·

613

Views

Anonymous ID: 06a234 Oct. 5, 2025, 8:24 p.m. No.23698491   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>23698485

14/ Judge: For all reasons stated in prior order, for TRO, grant second motion for TRO, originally I saw it as only California National Guard, but it seems based on conduct defendants and Texas, I see those as direct contravention of order I ordered yesterday, so I'm granting alternative TRO, and troubled by both Cal. & Texas which appears in violation of prior order, but I have concern about breadth and/or modifying prior TRO.

 

15/ Plaintiff: Appropriate to issue a second order with broader scope to incorporate reasoning, "exploited" b/c TRO limited to Oregon, so we want to prohibit stay federalized members of any national guards of any state or district of columbia. Judge: That's what I will do, I will enter a new TRO prohibiting relocation of federalization, within state of Oregon.

 

16/ Judge: Same reasoning applies, and entering order barring any federalized national guard. Denying motion for stay and administrative stay.