Anonymous ID: bcbe9d Oct. 6, 2025, 1:34 p.m. No.23701313   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>23701294

And there you have a US President blatantly denying the peoples well established right to "throw off" government when government no longer follows the will of the people, as declared in the declaration of independence and protected by the 9th amendment.

Anonymous ID: bcbe9d Oct. 6, 2025, 1:45 p.m. No.23701372   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>23701354

No I don't. Why do you project?

 

"Among those born to women, none have arisen greater than John, but even the least in the kingdom of heaven is greater than he".

 

What do you think that means? Some want it to mean a country, but multiple meanings exist.

Anonymous ID: bcbe9d Oct. 6, 2025, 2:15 p.m. No.23701512   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>23701462

 

Did it ever occur to you they want those they're targeting to think real videos are fake?

 

For instance, if you were running an op to collect evidence of law enforcements crimes, would you want law enforcement to realize how many people are talking about their crimes, or would you maybe tell them fake videos are coming?

Anonymous ID: bcbe9d Oct. 6, 2025, 3:01 p.m. No.23701746   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>1758 >>1830

>>23701676

>When you raise that right hand, swear that oath, you waive your Constitutional rights and operate completely at the mercy of the DOW, not the courts.

 

>โ€ฆthe courts authority isn't recognized anywhere in our chain of command.

 

The constitutions authority is recognized, and those who follow unlawful orders should be prosecuted.

 

Many CLAIM they love freedom, they even think they do. But they hate it with a passion. Some even sell themselves like prostitutes to bind themselves in chains, a chain of command, for "order". They couldn't break those chains if every life on the planet depended on it.

Anonymous ID: bcbe9d Oct. 6, 2025, 3:08 p.m. No.23701787   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>23701758

We're not at war, and military can not violate the constitution simply because they do not recognize it, or the peoples, authority over even POTUS. If the military does not recognize that, they are enemies to the constitution and should be dealt with accordingly.

 

No member of the military has authorization to follow an unlawful order, meaning an order potus has no authority to make. What does your oath say again?

 

The peoples rights are ABOVE potus.

Anonymous ID: bcbe9d Oct. 6, 2025, 3:18 p.m. No.23701844   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>1851 >>1910

>>23701830

 

Order followers are cowards.

 

There are two types who join the military, those who know they're binding themselves in chains they may one day have to break to stand with the people, and those who are cowards and can't take responsibility for their own actions so the "just follow orders".

 

It is VERY simple, if military obeys an unlawful order and violates the constitution, they liable.

Anonymous ID: bcbe9d Oct. 6, 2025, 3:36 p.m. No.23701912   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>23701880

 

>Oath of Enlistment

>I, _____, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; and that I will obey the orders of the President of the United States and the orders of the officers appointed over me, according to regulations and the Uniform Code of Military Justice. So help me God. (Title 10, US Code; Act of 5 May 1960 replacing the wording first adopted in 1789, with amendment effective 5 October 1962).

 

Notice which is first? The Constitution.

 

When the president gives an illegal order, the constitution takes precedence. When the court exercises checks and balances, the president does not have authority to "overrule" them and issue a then unconstitutional order, and the military oath is to the constitution FIRST.

 

If the president ordered you to fire on peaceful protestors, do you think you have a duty to follow that order?