dChan
Anonymous ID: ebbae0 Oct. 8, 2025, 7:49 p.m. No.23712513   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2557

Man recording in public is illegal detained, supervisor(?) comes and starts off saying he has no problem with him recording in public, then says when he records "security" it's a problem.

 

No, no it's not. If we can see it from public we can record it, there are no exceptions for banks, "security" etc. Just because you imagine someone is casing a place doesn't mean anything. The entire point of requiring REASONABLE ARTICULABLE SUSPICION to detain is so cops can't detain on a "hunch" or "gut feeling" or fear you MIGHT commit a crime. There HAS to be REASONABLE ARTICULABLE SUSPICION you are, have, or are about to commit a crime based on facts and the totality of circumstances. Cops can not lawfully turn a constitutional activity into RAS of a crime, but they are illegally harassing, detaining, or even arresting people for constitutionally protected activity. Cops like this ARE domestic enemies to the Constitution of the United States, they're just not smart enough to realize it. Deprivation of rights under color of law, even a 30 second unlawful detainment, is a CRIME.

 

How many have had their rights "chilled" and believe they can't record because of lawless cops?

Anonymous ID: ebbae0 Oct. 8, 2025, 8:15 p.m. No.23712641   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2663

>>23712619

>memorized Name and Badge number

 

Except they often cover them, and refuse to give them, just like ICE is refusing to identify. Notice how you assumed you can get name and badge number though? That's because it's a long standing tradition, a constitutional right established in law before any of us were born that most citizens assume they have, and is protected by the 9th amendment. The domestic enemies who love darkness and are afraid of being exposed in the light claim otherwise though.

 

They're going to learn otherwise.

Anonymous ID: ebbae0 Oct. 8, 2025, 8:26 p.m. No.23712669   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Domestic Enemy to the Constitution of the United States arrests auditor for telling him to shut up, which is constitutionally protected free speech. He rants several times he can arrest him for telling him to shut up before finally arresting him, even though he followed every order.

 

The order to get back at the beginning was unlawful but he still followed it. Arizona tried setting a minimum distance to record police of just 8 feet (others tried 20) and it was ruled unconstitutional because it's just that, unconstitutional. We have a RIGHT to approach and record from close enough to see and hear as long as we do not physically interfere, and we have the RIGHT to say what we want as long as we do not threaten. Our protected free speech CAN NOT BE INTERFERENCE under the law. WHY is this SO HARD for cops to understand in the supposed LAND OF THE FREE???

Anonymous ID: ebbae0 Oct. 8, 2025, 8:44 p.m. No.23712722   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2728

Same video, but at 1:53, the cop tells him he can take him to jail just for telling him to shut up. When James asks "for saying shut up?" the cop says "It's a safety issue".

 

The domestic enemy claims the two little words "shut up" are a safety issue so he can violate rights he swore to protect and take a mans freedom over two little words the law says he's free to say.

 

Officer Safety is Officer Cowardice. It's an excuse they use to force their will on others and punish them for being free and doing what they don't approve of.

Anonymous ID: ebbae0 Oct. 8, 2025, 8:59 p.m. No.23712779   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>23712758

In other words you're an insecure little bitch not smart enough to use words so you use violence. Guess what, the people can do that too, and I think it's high time the people remember Bad Elk.