It is odd as I have woman and men that are constantly talking or doing Ai on polygamist. I have never been married and not been in a relation period for 10 years. This is because I’d these people doing these thing no sexual relationships for 10 plus years.

I would argue this is extreme feminist neo liberalism that is show in a modern form.

This where you have woman that get 28% for one child in child support. If they have others with the same woman they get only a little more I believe up to 30% maybe 35%. I believe 30%.

So let’s do the math…

You have a man that makes 100k a year. You have 28k that he pays before taxes at even the highest tax bracket this is 18k a year likely has a job for medical and dental as well for the kids.

How much is food well 300 dollars a month is 3,600 dollars. What about cloths 3,600 dollars a year over kill. You are not at 18k you have 7,200 dollars. Then you add in any accidents so on maybe 2,500 dollars… you are at just 50% or the money.

Then if a woman has a kid with another man they get another 28% of his check. Not just 30% over all or 35%. So same woman is now making 36,000 dollars after taxes.

This where I would argue that woman are being encourage to have polygamist types of relationships for profit. With out getting married as there is no advantage for them to be married other then taking 50% of what a man has is they stay long enough to do so. This is a woman that may never work a day in here life as she is with a man. This is with a new man maybe but is not married.

This why child support should have an amount that is evaluated not percentages over all not capped. I believe most men would be happy to provide for their kids if it was for their kids in this way.

Imagine that if they had 10k after this is rent electric and so on in some states doing nothing. Have 2 kids with different fathers never work again until they are of age. This in some areas have been extended to 21 years I believe and medical 27 years. This is the reality of this…

So woman are not being encouraged to stay married but really only look at marriage as a means to commit to trying to take 50% or a man if it is worth it. This is if they saved money own things. If they are younger and don’t own a lot or did not save a lot why stay if they can take 28% of a man’s income and then do it again to another man. They may qualify for other assistance as well. This is again the issue in these realms. People want men to stay with woman it seem woman may have the advantage in anything for them not to in attitude and treating them walking all over them.

This needs to be changed is the reality. This is now where you have neo feminism that is rouge being enacted.

This is the numbers in summery and does not work in this context.

So woman are encouraged really not to be married unless they make money maybe in the future divorcing men as why marry if they do not have anything to take when they are already entitled to 28% or their income. Why have more then one child with a man when it is more advantageous to have it with mult men. So why stay with one man?