Anonymous ID: 93fbc9 Oct. 11, 2025, 2:52 p.m. No.23724364   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4630 >>4990 >>5228 >>5335 >>5350

US Military Hikes Operational Command Of Counter-Narcotics Operations In Latin America

By Phil Stewart Reuters October 11, 2025

 

WASHINGTON, Oct 10 (Reuters) – The Pentagon announced on Friday it is establishing a new counter-narcotics joint task force overseeing operations in Latin America, a move aimed to strengthen already intensifying military operations that have raised questions among legal experts.

 

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said the task force aimed “to crush the cartels, stop the poison, and keep America safe.”

 

“The message is clear: if you traffic drugs toward our shores, we will stop you cold,” Hegseth said on X.

 

STRIKING SUSPECTED DRUG BOATS

So far the missions have focused entirely on striking suspected drug boats in the waters of the Caribbean. The U.S. military has blown up at least four so far, killing 21 people.

 

The U.S. military’s Southern Command, which oversees U.S. operations in Latin America, said the new task force would be led by II Marine Expeditionary Force, a muscular unit capable of rapid overseas operations which is based at Camp Lejeune in North Carolina.

 

The U.S. military’s Southern Command said the II MEF, as it’s known in military parlance, would “synchronize and augment counter-narcotics efforts across the Western Hemisphere.”

 

“By forming a (task force) around II MEF headquarters, we enhance our ability to detect, disrupt, and dismantle illicit trafficking networks faster and at greater depth – together with our U.S. and partner-nation counterparts,” Admiral Alvin Holsey, who leads Southern Command, said in a statement.

 

It was unclear if the creation of the task force granted the U.S. troops in Latin America any additional authorities as President Donald Trump mulls potentially striking suspected drug trafficking sites inside Venezuela.

 

In a statement, Marine Lieutenant General Calvert Worth, who leads the II MEF and will head the task force, suggested the focus was still operations at sea. “This is principally a maritime effort, and our team will leverage maritime patrols, aerial surveillance, precision interdictions, and intelligence sharing to counter illicit traffic, uphold the rule of law, and ultimately better protect vulnerable communities here at home,” Worth said.

 

QUESTIONS OVER STRIKES

The attacks have alarmed Democratic lawmakers and raised questions among some legal experts, who see Trump testing the limits of the law as he expands the scope of presidential power.

 

The administration has not detailed what evidence it has against the vessels or individuals, has not said what type of munitions or platforms were used in the strikes or even what quantity of drugs the vessels were allegedly carrying.

 

Some former military lawyers say the legal explanations given by the Trump administration for killing suspected drug traffickers at sea instead of apprehending them fail to satisfy requirements under the law of war, which requires several criteria to be met before taking lethal action – including first using non-lethal means like firing warning shots.

 

Legal experts have also questioned why the U.S. military is carrying out the strikes instead of the Coast Guard, which is the main U.S. maritime law enforcement agency.

 

Last week, the Pentagon disclosed to Congress in a notification reviewed by Reuters that Trump has determined the United States is engaged in “a non-international armed conflict.”

 

The document aimed to explain the Trump administration’s legal rationale for unleashing U.S. military force in the Caribbean.

 

https://gcaptain.com/us-military-hikes-operational-command-of-counter-narcotics-operations-in-latin-america/

 

"Legal experts have also questioned why the U.S. military is carrying out the strikes instead of the Coast Guard, which is the main U.S. maritime law enforcement agency." High Endurance Cutters are not Destroyers. They would have to get close enough for the bad guys to have anti-tank rockets in range. The white hills with the big stripes make them easily seen miles away. Air assets gets the job done quickly with minimal risk to American forces. Legal "experts" need to stay in their lane

Anonymous ID: 93fbc9 Oct. 11, 2025, 3:08 p.m. No.23724422   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>23724401

Torfag, you obviously have no experience with military operations

You also do not understand the time and effort that goes into preparing a legal case against a powerful person

Nowfagging does not help either one

Anonymous ID: 93fbc9 Oct. 11, 2025, 3:40 p.m. No.23724532   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4548

>>23724467

>Is Ukraine conflict and Israel situation related behind the scenes somehow?

Yes, you muh joo shills will muh joo as much as possible no matter how many times you use the same inages

My question to you:

Does the futility of what you are trying to do here ever get to you?

Anonymous ID: 93fbc9 Oct. 11, 2025, 4:40 p.m. No.23724824   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4990 >>5228 >>5335 >>5350

US Threatens Visa Restrictions, Sanctions Against UN Members That Back IMO Emissions Plan

Reporting by Ismail Shakil and Lisa Baertlein Reuters October 11, 2025

 

Oct 10 (Reuters) – The United States on Friday threatened to use visa restrictions and sanctions to retaliate against nations that vote in favor of a plan put forward by a United Nations agency to reduce planet-warming greenhouse gas emissions from ocean shipping.

 

U.N. member nations are scheduled to vote next week on the International Maritime Organization’s Net-Zero Framework proposal to reduce global carbon dioxide gas emissions from the international shipping sector, which handles around 80% of world trade and accounts for close to 3% of global greenhouse gases.

 

Large container carriers, under pressure from investors to fight climate change, generally agree that a global regulatory framework is crucial to speeding up decarbonisation. Still, some of the world’s biggest oil tanker companies said they had “grave concerns” about the proposal.

 

“The Administration unequivocally rejects this proposal before the IMO and will not tolerate any action that increases costs for our citizens, energy providers, shipping companies and their customers, or tourists,” U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio, U.S. Energy Secretary Chris Wright and U.S. Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy said in a joint statement.

 

The “proposal poses significant risks to the global economy and subjects not just Americans, but all IMO member states to an unsanctioned global tax regime that levies punitive and regressive financial penalties,” they said.

 

Without global regulation, the maritime industry would face a patchwork of regulations and increasing costs without effectively curbing climate-warming greenhouse gas emissions, supporters of the IMO proposal have said.

 

The U.S. is considering retaliation against U.N. countries that support the plan, the U.S. officials said in Friday’s statement.

 

That includes potentially blocking vessels flagged in those nations from U.S. ports, imposing visa restrictions and fees, and slapping sanctions on officials “sponsoring activist-driven climate policies.”

 

https://gcaptain.com/us-threatens-visa-restrictions-sanctions-against-un-members-that-back-imo-emissions-plan/