Eventually some reporter will have to bring up Q in a press briefing
I believe a lot of what Q says but saying "Lurk Moar" is a weaselly way of getting out of being accountable. Don't act like you know why the deadline is passing without full disclosure, because that's what Q implied. July is when the truth was supposed to come out, and then it just ended up being more vague tickling.
I have no problem with this personally, but stop acting like you have the answer as to why full disclosure didn't come out.
And don't give me the "July isn't over yet". It will be soon. And then when July ends, it will just be the next mile marker; the next deadline.
>….except for the fact that "deadlines" have been given by Q since literally the first week (remember the indictments in early November?), plus all the "booms" and "glorious" weeks we were told about, and not a single one came to pass.
ergo, we know Q is always spreading disinformation when he sets a date for anything.
Then why does he set a date for anything? And why do so many anons buy into it and "dig" into POTUS tweet time signatures kill boxes? Whole breads have been devoted to predicting the future. If what you are saying is true, then you, yourself, really are discrediting all the hard work anons have put in.
You are not in the know, so stop acting like you are
Q 1747:
>5 min delay.
>Message sent.
>Q
Fucking really? If you have the answers, then explain to me what that even means? How are you justifying your faith in that?
He could just as easily not post any dates at all. That's what fucking Nostradamus did. Just say "soon".
Anything other than saying "soon", is disingenuous and insulting to all the anons who have put in the hard work. Especially if Q doesn't mean it. Any deadline passed becomes a red flag. It's sketchy. Sure it throws the enemy of our tracks, but it also corrodes anon's self esteem and it wastes their time. Why would Q do this?
Tell me why would Q want to waste our time?
Can you at least answer that instead of weaseling out again into a "Lurk Moar dumbass" response? If you can do that, then you win the ticket, and you can actually shoulder the responsibility of speaking about what you claim to believe in.
By ignoring the red flags.
Be an individual and explain why you believe.
Stop assuming that vague crumbs and all the time signature work we did will strengthen my faith.
It's all bogus now.