Anonymous ID: e6dbfc Oct. 12, 2025, 1:02 p.m. No.23728022   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>23728003 LB

 

They're not taken, many still exercise their rights and stand up to the lawlessness, and as long as anyone is willing to die or go to jail for their rights, such as free speech, those rights aren't taken, a bunch of cowards just keep trying to take them.

Anonymous ID: e6dbfc Oct. 12, 2025, 1:19 p.m. No.23728083   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>8090 >>8509 >>8521

>>23728054

>The mother of Jesus

 

She's Johns mother, not Jesus.

 

Among those born to women, none have arisen greater than John, but even the least in the kingdom of heaven is greater than he.

 

Mary was OUTSIDE when someone told Jesus His mother and brothers were there to see Him. He asked who His mother and brothers were, pointed to His disciples, and said here are my mother and brothers"โ€ฆ.. remember, Mary was outside.

 

A woman in the crown called out "blesses is the womb that bore and breasts that fed you" and Jesus replied "blessed rather are those who hear the will of God and obey".

 

Jesus asked why the call the messiah the Son of David, if David calls Him Lord how can he be His son? Mary calls Jesus Lord.

 

When Jesus saw His mother and the disciple whom He loved standing nearby, He said to His mother, โ€œWoman, here is your son.โ€ Then He said to the disciple, โ€œHere is your mother.โ€ So from that hour, this disciple took her into his home.

Anonymous ID: e6dbfc Oct. 12, 2025, 2:21 p.m. No.23728356   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>8368 >>8387 >>8389

>>23728322

They do. Every time they violate someone's rights and claim they're just doing their job.

 

I don't have to dehumanize them, they have done that. They are literally domestic enemies to the Constitution of the United States of America and We the People it represents. They violate the peoples rights daily nationwide, rights they swore to uphold and protect, or they back and prop up those who do, KNOWING what the Constitution says in plain language they can easily understand. They CHOOSE to ignore what they can read for themselves and choose to follow the teachers of the law in long robes who love the seat of honor, while happily accepting the paycheck paid by funds those same people are FORCED UNDER THREAT AND COLOR OF LAW to give.

 

They've demonized themselves.

Anonymous ID: e6dbfc Oct. 12, 2025, 2:26 p.m. No.23728380   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>8387

>>23728368

Each one is a MEMBER of a lawless criminal gang violating the peoples rights every single day across this nation. They are part of an occupying force actively engaged in violation the peoples rights under color of law.

 

I do love the people, I hate their crimes. I suggest you learn the difference. To love someone is to correct their bad behavior and tell them the Truth, not ignore it and pretend it doesn't exist. When you love you child you don't let them act like a monster. A father disciplines one He loves.

Anonymous ID: e6dbfc Oct. 12, 2025, 2:39 p.m. No.23728433   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>23728389

Truth is still Truth if only a few think it. Those "legal minds" are morons backing and upholding the bar. Ever notice how many politicians are lawyers?

 

Instead of arguing how nobody agrees with me and the credentials fallacy, how about you argue some facts?

 

Please explain how criminalizing protesting outside a court or judges home is not a violation of 1A.

 

Please explain how banning cameras in a court house of a public trial is not a violation of 1A and the accused's right to a public trial.

 

Please explain how the recent rash of videos of people being removed or arrested for "disparaging remarks" during their time to speak at public meetings is not a violation of 1A.

 

Please explain how threatening to arrest or arresting a journalist for recording on or in publicly accessible public property is not a violation of 1A.

 

Please explain how gun control is not an infringement on the peoples right to keep and bear arms and violation of 2A.

 

Please explain how roadside civil asset forfeiture is not a violation of 4A and 5A.

 

Please explain how requiring people to "sign in" on a sheet of paper or show ID to enter and access public services in a publicly owned building is not a violation of 4A.