>now steal the royals - i mean really, why even keep Royalty around?
>
>(looking your way too, Brits)
Honest answer from a Brit: I'd sooner have our hereditary monarchy than your political Kennedy/Bush/Clinton dynasties.
>But the dynasties are just cheaper wanna-be royals
Presidents and presidentia dynastie may be wannabe royals but they're not cheaper than royalty. Presidents, the world over, cost their respective taxpayers much more than our British monarchy costs us.