>>2376287 (pb)
Interestingly, its an historical fact that in the old times jews didn't practiced Usury on each other.
Needs moar pepe faces on the boat, lolz
This.
This is why judaism IS a supremacist ideology which WILL be banned fomr the West along with islam.
Great posts, thanks!
Lol, choke on the facts:
Let us now learn a little about jewish culture and history so you can understand why judaism IS a supremacist ideology
From the book “When Victims Rule” (link to book: https://archive.is/1IEWq ):
“ In order to understand the present and prospects for the future, something must be understood about the past. Jews claim their origins to a seminal patriarch, Abraham, in the land of Ur (today part of Iraq) 4,000 years ago. Abraham was not a farmer or village member of a settled community. He was likely one of the "wandering" tribes of his time, a citizenship less, "outsider" social class known as the "Apiru," or "Habiru" (Hebrews) who were scattered across a wide area of the Middle East, from Syria to Egypt. [ANDERSON, p. 33] According to traditional Jewish religious belief, God is reputed to have singled out 75-year old Abraham among all people on earth and struck an arrangement with him, providing his progeny the consummate family inheritance: "If Abraham will follow the commandments of God, then He, in His turn, will make the descendants of Abraham His Chosen People and place them under His protection … God at this time stipulates only one commandment, and makes only one promise." [DIMONT, p. 29] The initial agreement, by modern standards, seems extraordinarily peculiar. God's commandment was that all males by the eighth day of birth must have the foreskin of their penises cut off, a painfully literal branding of Jewish distinction around the male procreative organ:
"God … said to Abraham … You shall circumcise the flesh of
the foreskin and that shall be the Covenant between Me
and you." GENESIS: 17:9-13
With this physical marking, notes Barnet Litvinoff, “no male child born of Jewish parentage is ever allowed to forget he is a Jew … it reminds him of the doctrine of the chosen people.” [LITVINOFF, p. 5] "As a sign of this sacred bond, of being special seed, Chosen," note Herbert Russcol and Margarlit Banai, "The Lord of the Universe commands Abraham" to circumcize "every man child among you." And as the Torah states it: "I will establish my covenant between Me and thee and thy seed after thee in their generations for an everlasting covenant." [RUSSCOL/BANAI, 1970, p. 173] Is this alleged commandment by God to the Abrahamic "seed" in Jewish tradition not racial?
"Circumcision," says Lawrence Hoffman, "has thus remained the sine qua non of Jewish identity throughout time. Jews came to believe that it warded off danger, and even saved Jews from damnation, that the sign of circumcision was tantamount to carrying God's ineffable name carved in the flesh, that it was a means of attaining mystical unity with the creator, and that it brought about visionary experience." [HOFFMAN, p. 11] It also symbolized, on the male genitals, special attention to the genetic continuance of the progeny of Abraham, that – if they obeyed the laws and demands of God – they would someday be as "numerous as the stars.""
–
>Problems with the above facts:
1)
Circumcision is scientifically proven to cause permanent brain damage in children (pic related 1);
2)
Its a form of non-consentual religious branding;
3)
Its a barbaric form of child abuse via male genital mutilation; and
4)
The first reason it is done in the first place is to remind the jewish children that they are "God's chosen", which incites the jews to adopt a supremacist mindset toward the goyim/catle, who according to judaism are implicitly inferior due to not being jews, and thus, not part of the ones who were "chosen by God".
Important note
1)
For those that say that ”most science today is fraud”, in order to implicitly downplay the relevance of the studies about circumcision causing permanent brain damage in children I say this:
Go grab the test I am referring to and disprove it using the scientific method then if you want to solidify what you're trying to imply.
Extreme pain in children scars alters their brain structure (aka: brain damage), circumcision does that to children.
2)
For those that say that “As a very acomplished person, I see no problem with the process of circumcision because I am a very acomplished person”, I say this:
Doesn't mean the damage isn't there.
Doens't make the process of circumcision any less barbaric.
Doesn't make judaism any less of an idological threat to the West.
>Also:
You could just be lying. Try to not use anecdotes next time, try to use verifiable facts :)
They will just plunder Latin America and Asia after we deal with them in the West.
And when are we going to start charging rabbis and priests with subversion for all their efforts into normalizing said support of "refugee" influx?
Those traitors will have what they deserve.