TYB
trip dubs, noice!
Brady Harris
@StormCat5_
I’m honestly at a loss for words right now. Category 5 #Melissa keeps drifting farther west - the eye is now nearly outside the National Hurricane Center’s forecast cone, which was issued only 1 hour ago…
This storm is defying every environmental factor trying to pull it north. It’s baffling.
It’s also getting stronger, which is wild considering it’s already pushing the limits of physics for how intense a hurricane can get. It may even be overpowering the trough that’s trying to steer it north. Unreal.
Jamaica still isn’t safe and should prepare for a devastating hurricane - but the farther west Melissa tracks, the better the outcome for the island.
Keep Praying. 🇯🇲
Animated radar sequence displays Hurricane Melissa as a large swirling storm system with a defined eye and intense red-colored core indicating maximum winds, overlaid with white forecast track lines curving westward marked by purple dots, evolving over frames to show the eye shifting outside the projected cone amid colorful intensity gradients from blue outer bands to yellow and red inner walls, accompanied by Weather.com watermark in the corner.
5:20 PM · Oct 27, 2025 · 136.5K Views
https://x.com/StormCat5_/status/1982935576853533122
For someone at a loss for words he sure had a lot to say, kek. But seriously, Gulf of America? No hit on Jamaica or Gitmo?
It might buy you a really nice radio controlled model of one, kek.
“Bad Fuel” May Have Caused Back-To-Back Nimitz Aircraft Crashes: Trump
An MH-60R Sea Hawk helicopter and an F/A-18F Super Hornet crashed into the South China Sea within a half-hour of each other on Sunday
Howard Altman Published Oct 27, 2025 6:56 PM EDT
U.S. President Donald Trump has suggested that contaminated fuel may have been a factor in the U.S. Navy’s loss of an MH-60R Seahawk helicopter and an F/A-18F Super Hornet in the South China Sea on Sunday. In a very strange chain of events, the two aircraft, both assigned to the supercarrier USS Nimitz, went down within 30 minutes of each other while on separate missions. The crews of the Seahawk and the Super Hornet were both safely retrieved.
“They’re gonna let me know pretty soon,” Trump told reporters while flying aboard Air Force One on Monday. “I think they should be able to find out. It could be bad fuel. I mean, it’s possible it’s bad fuel. Very unusual that that would happen.”
Asked whether he thought “foul play” led to the crashes, Trump said “I don’t think so,” and reiterated his contaminated fuel theory.
“We don’t believe it was anything nefarious,” a U.S. Navy official told The War Zone.
moar at:
https://www.twz.com/sea/bad-fuel-may-have-caused-back-to-back-nimitz-aircraft-crashes-trump
Anna Paulina Luna
@realannapaulina
All the CHINA bot farms are about to be big mad! So happy that this is being done!
Quote
Insider Paper
@TheInsiderPaper
·
5h
JUST IN - 𝕏 will soon display which country a user is based in. The users can opt to reveal their country or region - reports
Image
5:52 PM · Oct 27, 2025 · 50.3K Views
https://x.com/realannapaulina/status/1982943513936384351
BIG MAD. kek
>If bad fuel, more than just two a/c would be in the drink
One would think. However anon is unaware of the tempo of flight operations at the time. Also unaware of the methods and variables involved with USN Carrier refueling operations. For instance. Is fuel all stored in one big tank on board? Doubtful. If separate tanks then were they scraping the bottom of the barrel to get the last available fuel from an almost empty one before switching over to a fresh tank to fuel aircraft from? Just don't know enough to say. Perhaps a carrier air operation enlightened anon would like to chime in and tell us how it might have unfolded this way?
Ladies and Frogs I present to you Hanni Hanjour. Or for those of you who understand speech out the side of one's neck, The Han Dynasty. Grok concurs
that the timing is feasible. (see final image) They must have had inside information about the plans of those staging the attacks in NYC that day. And timing indocates they waited for confirmation of same. They knew the US Military would be off balance due to simultaneous drills for a similar event. NYC would be a good diversion. So they took a sucker punch at Washington DC. Only half successful. But it was a complete surprise to even the most well informed 9-11 conspirator. Shanksville, how poetic. Like a prisoner gets shanked.
So, according to my working model of what really happened on 9-11, if the US had somehow managed to slam down an information lid over what happened at the WTC in NYC, then the Pentagon attack and Shanksville might not have happened at all. Even a partial information blackout, one that prevented MSM reporting over radio and television, might have been enough to keep the attacks limited to NYC alone. Because the two planned cruise missile strikes on Washington DC would never have happened without confirmation of the attacks in NYC having taken place. And I believe that confirmation was made by monitoring US news reporting. No report then no launch. They needed US defenses off balance before attempting such a bold and risky action.
Furthermore, WTC 7 could have possibly been a nerve center during planning and a potential source of evidence. Therefore it was wired to blow in case things went sideways. The surprise attacks in DC qualified. So the decision was made late in the afternoon to pull it.
Maybe the Brits didn't know that was building 7? Being from out of town and all. Maybe they didn't know the NYC very well? Or maybe her live shot was in front of a green screen. And some dope in the studio used that still image taken earlier to fill in behind her not realizing what people would perceive. Don't get me wrong though. There was definitely foreknowledge on the part of someone. Whether the BBC had any is up for debate for reasons I have outlined here. People knew though. Just look at the airline stock short sales for instance. The point I'm trying to make is that China had foreknowledge of the attacks in NYC. Opted to add their attack in DC. And surprised everyone planning the attacks in NYC. Which is why you see no planes at the Pentagon or Shanksville. It was an entirely different series of attacks made at a most oppourtune time for the CCP.
vidrel detective is TOTALLY believable. nothing to see here
After all, according to Detective Jiminez, 9-11 happens every year. kek.
Maybe 2.3 trillion was paid to the Chinese for Clinton bombing their embassy in Belgrade. And they decided to help destroy the evidence out of a sense of self preservation?