Checks and balances are getting old? So you want a king?
I'm well aware. The judicial has violated the constitution, but so have the others, and all three branches don't have the authority they've exercised.
Many are stupid and don't realize they've been "baited" into showing their support for a king, whether it be potus (Obama or Trump) or government itself. A king is the "authority, it can be a man or a group. Many will swear up and down they love liberty/freedom, they even think they do, but they actually hate it with a passion. What they love and want is a king, an "authority" that likes/agrees with and dislikes/disagrees with the same things as them. If they like/agree with it, everyone should be "free" to do it (or even forced) but if they don't like/agree with it, it should be illegal, and even if it's not illegal you should still suffer for doing it because they said so!
Many have been baited into showing that they are enemies of freedom.
We elect representatives, but those representatives are bound by OUR rights and constitution.
To appoint a king is not very bright.
Cry and project moar
Define who you think the insurgents are
Anon, you still think this is about RvsD don't you? It's not about a corrupt party, it's about a corrupt government, made up of BOTH parties. The left wing and the right wing are both controlled by the same "mind".
You ask what the remedy is, the remedy is to "throw off government" but as soon as anyone talks about using their right to do so, both parties start talking treason, because it threatens THEIR control.
True evil exercises authority not given.
Let me ask you, do the american people have a right to vote for a communist?
>begins implementing or enforcing laws repugnant to our constitution
You mean like gun control, roadside civil asset forfeiture, 100mile inside border checks, no recording in public trials, police, judicial, and presidential immunity, etc?
Repugnant to our constitution laws like that?
I have many rights, including those government does not recognize.
I asked if people have the RIGHT to vote for them.
You live in the land of the FREE, if people are not FREE to vote for communism in your mind, then you're an enemy to freedom. That's what many who claim to love freedom don't get. I myself am not communist, but capitalism is no better. Look around, people are suffering. The Truth is, all the systems suffer from the same problem, GREED.
Our government has been hypocritical from the start.
Denying non property owners their vote denies citizens equal representation based on money/class.
It's not the document, it's the principle that's partially enumerated in the document. Our rights are not granted by the constitution, and not all rights are enumerated in it.
You gonna SMTFU?
You don't seem to understand who the targets of this op are.
Hypocritical is hypocritical, especially when it's KNOWINGLY.
There you go projecting.
I have no need for lies or tricks.
I repeat, do the people not have the right to "throw off" their current form of government?
>In Congress, July 4, 1776
>The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America, When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.
>We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends,it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.–Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government. The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid world.
Yes, they do.
Are you the American People their right to alter or to abolish government, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness?
Oops, should read Are you denying the American People
Perhaps losing an illusion of freedom and gaining freedom is better than an illusion you're used to. What is it exactly we're fixing to lose in your mind? A corrupt government violating the very rights, and principles it was founded on?
I've read it, and clearly understand it much better than you do kek.
Have you read the declaration of independence? Is it a recognized founding document? Does it spell out the right to alter or abolish government, which would include what the constitution "guarantees"?
Does the 9th amendment to the constitution make clear those rights are retained and reserved by the people? Like it or not, the people have the authority to abolish that constitution.
Oh I'm not against our constitution, I'm all for the constitution and stopping government from violating it daily. What's funny is the people claiming to love it stand by and watch is violated every single day and most cheer on those who do it.
The thing is, the constitution guarantees the rights I'm standing for.
Are you hallucinating? Please show me where I said the document establishes the right?
It is LAW that protects (or is supposed to) our rights, that many swear an oath to uphold and protect.
Our rights exist even without the constitution, but the constitution is the LAW that LE are supposed to uphold and enforce that guarantees our rights.
I never said otherwise.
I agree with those statements.
My point though, is people have the right to vote for communism, and people have the right to alter or abolish the government. Our current lawless government and many who support it do not think do, and those people are enemies to the peoples rights and constitution.
I believe the 9th amendment is going to come into play. Marker [9]. People like to say the rights enumerated in the DOI aren't guaranteed by the constitution, but the 9th says they are.
That would deprive citizens rights based on wealth/class and never should have been in the beginning, but I'm sure the founders did it as a compromise.
For a free people to be free, they must have equal rights and equal representation.
Anon, read the declaration of independence. Notice it says the people have the right and duty to abolish any form of government and institute new government?
If you deny others rights you are an enemy to freedom and the US Constitution. YOU feel free to leave. The peoples rights are ABOVE government.
I am not a communist, but I will stand for the rights of those I disagree with.
Notice you attack the messenger, not the message.
LIBERTY
You don't have liberty if you don't have representation.
It also says "That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, –That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness."
Guess you don't like that part though huh?
>ya wanna eat
>ya gotta work
Unless you're rich, disabled, have a rich boyfriend/girlfriend etc…
Do I have the right to protect my properties when a person who subscribes to the concept of "seize the means of production" in it's literal sense attempt s to take it from me?
Take it from you how? Does our current government have the right of eminent domain? That takes peoples property. I'm not clear on what you're asking here. Take as in steal? No.
>Do a portion of "THE PEOPLE" have the right to throw off the shackles of a government that another portion of "The People" thrust upon them?
>Does that portion have the right to separate themselves as we did from England.
People have the right to refuse to live under tyranny of others, but that's not to say the others are going to respect their rights. According to our Declaration of Independence it is a right for people to no longer consent and try to abolish or change that form of government, and that right is protected by the 9th amendment to the Constitution, however that right doesn't mean you can force others to go along with your separation against their will.
If you don't get to vote they don't represent you.
Not everyone wants or needs a job. Does that bother you?
You should really work on your reading comprehension, I never said that.
The fact is, a government that doesn't allow you to vote is not a government that represents you. If you lose, you still got to vote. As long as that vote was fair. What part of people CONSENT to government do you not understand? People CONSENT to government they have a voice in, not one they don't.
By the way I'm way too old to know what nonsense they're teaching now.
Not everyone who doesn't work expects a handout. Not everyone wants or needs to be a slave to another or serve money.
Did you read what I said?
Some choose not to, and they don't live off government money. Many are homeless.
Not everyone wants to live in this system where money rules.
Compare to what they would charge anyone else with for what he did.
Big surprise after the Trumps FCC let apartment complexes and comcast force comcast into renters leases
IN the pigs, not the pigs themselves.
>nuclear arsenal