So she's German, not Asian.
'establish the rights'
spoken like a communist
rights are from GOD
documents merely describe them.
'guarantees the rights'
no, it just explains what they are.
It's a piece of paper.
it's PEOPLE who enforce it.
and there are not guarantees.
you live in a fantasy world.
>establish
not a 'shill bot'
did I post to the wrong anon?
Rights come from GOD not pieces of paper.
I must have confused you with someone else.
>>23795467
reported for making violent threats.
a vote for any democrat is a vote for Joseph Stalin and Mao
Amen!
people who take care of themselves, live alone, cook their own meals, maintain their own property, don't go to a job: they still 'work'.
they do all the stuff that they need to do to continue and survive.
It's work putting up with the crazy people at the stores. It's work driving to the market through traffic with people driving like maniacs.
It's work paying the bills, making sure finances are in order, making appointments, doing dishes, laundry, cleaning, and the various charity stuff they do.
having a 'job' with a boss man who rebills it to a contract and takes 20 % seemed to be the only other alternative.
what a pathetic and weak position.
blame people you don't even know.
many many people realized that the rat race was rigged to favor some over the others.
That we were slaves to people who hate us and live over seas and take the best of the first fruits.
we dealt with it through rebelling: we paid down all our debts. We lived meager lives. We didn't go on elaborate vacations. We didn't waste our money on drugs and drink. We survived.
We supported Donald Trump.
and you? what did you do? expect handouts and want everyone to respect you for doing nothing?
and blaming others and using big words.
what you do is the height of what you claim to be against: projecting as if people are so thin skinned that they'd think that every reference to evil is about them.
you don't really remember that crap do you?
tell me it's all a larp.
you sound like a bad pulp novel from the late 1960s early 1970s: what they used to call 'horror' or 'fantasy'.
or even a poorly written comic book.
no, anon, the democrats are destroying themselves.
they are showing all their cards. They have admitted that people who are hungry are 'leverage'
that is their "let them eat cake" moment.
they are destroying themselves and infighting will follow.
what you suggest would play right into their hands and allow them to rally their (crazy) true-believers to fight the 'man who would be king'.
we have no tradition of dictators in this country.
In the United States the term 'dictator' doesn't invoke Caesar who wanted everyone fed, but it invokes Hitler who wanted people he disagreed with put in camps.
there is no one near you skinning a cat.
you're larping a sick story and are probably high on something.
you try to spread fear.
just because someone looses a bit of aid doesn't turn them into a depraved psychopath.
many of the most vocal who complain about their entitlements have feathered their nests. They aren't going to start murdering people for a few dollars in change.
this is what is wrong with every democrat narrative: humans are always presented as hyperbolic dependants of the government who quickly devolved into psychopathic criminality as soon as their little piece is taken away.
In fact: real humans would ask for a hand when they are down not clonk someone on the head and murder them for chump change and risk execution.
the Democrat / Marxist narrative always presents hyperbolic immoral charactertures as if that's how humans really behave. They don't.