Anonymous ID: e6457d Nov. 2, 2025, 12:19 p.m. No.23803098   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>3123

>>23803075

>shelter where they would stay

So you want daily milk, but you are granting sheep free will, and if none wants to stay at your place, then you got no milk. And otherwise you get more and more sheep until your place is 100% filled up and thenโ€ฆ

And if sheep just do not want to give you milk, then that's fine too, I guess.

Yeah, that totally makes sense.

 

>not wanting death or damage to anyone

good luck with that

 

>by only drinking the milk of sheep

so you want now tons of milk every day.

None of that makes any sense.

>no need to eat their lambs

Great, and what do you do when your place is filled up with sheep?

That's the logical problem with wanting daily milk, but not thinking about the consequences.

 

>I am forced to eat toxins

No, you aren't.

>because I get no sheep milk

???

>I am designed for sheep milk

no, you aren't. You aren't a sheep (well you sort of are).

 

>drowing

yeah, I literally said just by DRINKING too much water you will kill yourself, which you denied.

Drinking too much water will kill you.

And drinking to much milk will therefore also kill you.

Anonymous ID: e6457d Nov. 2, 2025, 12:45 p.m. No.23803144   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>3191

>>23803123

>I do not need tons of milk, maybe 1-2 liters daily

>just 1-2 liters daily

>just

lmao

https://www.whoopsydaisyfarm.com/blog/how-much-milk-do-we-get-from-our-sheep

For those who MUST have a general estimate, your ewe can produce anywhere from one cup to one liter of milk per day

 

>I will fill up not only my space, but also everyone else's

Great. But it won't stop, because you want your daily 2 liters and therefore need pregnant sheep all the time non-stop.

 

>drinking "too much milk" can never kill you

Milk contains water.

"too much water" will kill you, it starts not being healthy at all.

https://www.bbc.com/reel/video/p07rxt5w/why-drinking-too-much-water-could-be-life-threatening

She had hyponatremia, a condition caused by drinking too much water, diluting all the salts and minerals in the body.

 

inb4

>no, you don't need minerals nor salts

hahaha

go ahead, try it

in fact you can try it with one of your sheep or a cow first.

 

oh fuck, salt is also one of these "minerals" that according to you no one needs.

ask a farmer about the salt block for their cows.

Anonymous ID: e6457d Nov. 2, 2025, 1:46 p.m. No.23803355   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>3361

>>23803191

>whatever minerals and salt ever needed is naturally in perfect proportions

That makes zero sense, stop shitposting.

when the animal doesn't get the minerals from the food, they won't be in its milk.

and if you know how to feed that properly, you can simply feed yourself these minerals and avoid enslaving the animal.

Anonymous ID: e6457d Nov. 2, 2025, 1:58 p.m. No.23803367   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>23803361

When the soil is depleted, the plant won't get minerals from the ground.

When the animal now eats the plant, there won't be all required minerals contained within the plant.

And thus the animal won't get these minerals.

 

At best it will deplete it's internal reserves, until it gets sick. In that case, that guy would have done a great job. Caused an animal to get sick, so that he gets his milk.

 

And ingesting minerals is not always easy.

Through plants it works fine.

But through other means it doesn't really work, see pharma supplements, where absorption rate is a few percent at best.

Anonymous ID: e6457d Nov. 2, 2025, 3:31 p.m. No.23803576   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>23803565

>it's a secure connection

what is this even supposed to mean?

 

>thought out

yeah, give me an actually secure web browser.

Until then..

 

btw. does the Tesla-crap have a built-in web browser?

>well, yeah, but hacking it, you won't be able to directly access the driving system

Exactly.

>that's on another VLAN

Anonymous ID: e6457d Nov. 2, 2025, 4:07 p.m. No.23803704   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>3716

>>23803682

it stops being fun when someone remote controls these shit cars into children and asks for shit coins.

 

imagine no truck drivers anymore, instead hackable systems driving around, each with a weight of multiple tons.

 

I'm not looking forward to this.

Anonymous ID: e6457d Nov. 2, 2025, 4:18 p.m. No.23803744   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>3765

>>23803726

no, it's not.

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OnStar

including communications, in-vehicle security, emergency services, turn-by-turn navigation, and remote diagnostics systems

 

that is not INTERNET REMOTE CONTROLLED DRIVING.

 

it's digital slop though and tracking.

Anonymous ID: e6457d Nov. 2, 2025, 4:42 p.m. No.23803854   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>23803726

>that started in 1989

>onstar

that's false info.

onstar started in 1996.

 

and back then it seems it didn't use internet / internet protocols, but only GPS, cell network and voice recognition.

 

it morphed into a shitphone app, but that was done very recently. and I'm too lazy to figure out since when it started at least using HTTP.

 

anyway:

>slow down / turn off

vs.

>drive into this kindergarden

 

in the first case in the absolutely worst case the ones inside the car may be in danger, by for example turning it off right while it rolls onto train tracks (in theory)

 

in the other case everyone is in danger, because the shitty car is literally driven by internet and can do whatever the hacker wants it to do.

Anonymous ID: e6457d Nov. 2, 2025, 4:47 p.m. No.23803873   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>23803841

>control cars since 89

in fact a double lie

not only didn't they start in 89, but 1996, but back then they only did:

 

Automatic Crash Response, Emergency Services, Roadside Assistance, and Stolen Vehicle Assistance

 

and thus not controlling anything, only tracking.

FUCKING LIAR