Anonymous ID: 1fa166 Nov. 4, 2025, 5:37 p.m. No.23812766   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>2783 >>2801

>>23812737

What if there was a rare, but routine comet on a hyperbolic orbit that passed through the inner solar system without online hype? Would anyone notice without the hype and grift clickbait? An industry fed by clicks based on sensationalism will fade like a comet after perihelion, and will only be revived by the next hype-worthy routine event.

Anonymous ID: 1fa166 Nov. 4, 2025, 5:43 p.m. No.23812805   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>2850

>>23812749

> Cool story, bro

Dismissal. Exactly on point. When 'Q' began posting, the opposition and clickbait opportunists invented numerical 'decodes' and date 'deltas' to spread a smokescreen across what Q wrote.

Datefagging never worked, which is why the board created the term years ago.

Anonymous ID: 1fa166 Nov. 4, 2025, 5:49 p.m. No.23812840   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>2916

>>23812783

>There have already been several.

Indeed. The commonality seems to be a scientist or scientists seeking popularity, fame and funding is/are driving the hype way out of proportion to the science. Comet observations are valuable and Harvard was doing fine before the hype.

Anonymous ID: 1fa166 Nov. 4, 2025, 5:55 p.m. No.23812882   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>2940

>>23812801

>3i Atlas came from the same point as the Wow signal. Do the Math.

How about we continue this discussion after the comet's perihelion when its apparent magnitude is diminishing faster than the hype? In a few months there will be no sensation, no emotion, no sources of confusion. The attention will have turned to the new thing to be hyped. We can have a rational discussion then, as friends.

Anonymous ID: 1fa166 Nov. 4, 2025, 6:02 p.m. No.23812913   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>2926

>>23812850

>Nice try, Q said dates are important. To keep track of them.

It takes more than a Q platitude to prevail in a discussion of datefagging, Anon. There are still many witnesses here of endless attempts at linking words, phrases, numbers, dates to endless bs theories explaining the posts.

'Futures proves past' concerns events and applying current knowledge towards interpretation, not numberfagging by Newfags.