The unhinged voice of 'only things concerning Israel matter and anyone who disagrees is a hater'.
that voice is almost as rediculous and hateful as the 'anyone who disagrees with marxists who larp as muslims is an 'Islamophobe'.
in both cases you have people only concerned about their own point of view and willing to stomp on anyone who disagrees with them, almost like they are cut from the same cloth.
as ridiculous as "a straight man that won't have sex with me, as a trans woman, is a hater."
you're just using that term to be provocative. I can't see any relationship to that and the Marxists colonizing non-Marxist cities.
The problem with the Marxist carpet baggers is that as they carpet bag from place to place they always have to have somewhere that is well established. If they ever got to the part where they controlled the whole world it would all collapse because there wouldn't be anyone making new cities. It would be like China is: where the people subsist and the boar-ish aristocracy can only steal ideas from other lands.
If all the lands are marxists there will be no ideas and the world will stagnate.
the marxists need the non marxists or else they perish.
without the welfare system they would be NOTHING.
my experience is that too much sugar is very bad.
no, Christians are NOT Buddhists.
still incorrect.
Is you judging them also a kind of 'lukewarmness'?
How can you know them well enough to tell how devout they are?
are you a Buddhist?
did you learn enough scripture just to ape out the things that Jesus warned against or are you actually about evangelization of people who need to be shown the Way and the Life and take the Narrow Path and pass through the Narrow Gate?
you are not in charge of deciding who is and who isn't going to Heaven.
what you are saying is apostate and not very loving towards sinful Christians who seem lukewarm.
maybe you ought to concentrate on your own soul and detach from the idea that you can know those other people well enough to say what you do about them. It's obvious to me, it ought to be obvious to you.
Detached people, pious people, aren't going to make a show for you to show you how much passion they really have.
the holiest people might appear to be that person who seem the oddest and least likely person to become, quickly, a saint.
there you go again, casting stones at people.
You're a common type, you are always here lurking trying to get people to loose their faith.
what you say is you trying to cast spells on people. It's not 'how it is'.
there you go again.
I never say you could.
I said you try.
so does that mean, in your false logic, that I must be a believer?
what ever algebra you use is probably wrong.