>>2383238 (Last bread)
Agree on everything you posted, anon.
Maybe by 2024 well have 1/4 of the corrupt fuckers out of gummint …. maybe.
>>2383238 (Last bread)
Agree on everything you posted, anon.
Maybe by 2024 well have 1/4 of the corrupt fuckers out of gummint …. maybe.
Thank you Baker.
>maybe a very long shutdown with only select individuals getting retro pay will starve out some of them?
Except that hose crooked fucks have all made themselves rich af by selling out America. Couldn't starve them out. Jail time or rope is needed.
>would a prolonged government shutdown provide any extra powers or privileges for POTUS?
I don't think a shutdown gives POTUS any special powers.
>I'm betting that Sarah or even Trump gets asked within a week
More interesting than them being asked is what their answer will be …. confirm or deny?
I have these. From Aldi.
Had to try them.
Unfortunately, they taste like cardboard. Very bland.
>my guess is neither
Agree. "We have no comment at this time."
That would be a cop-out, imo.
And it would piss off a LOT of anons.
But it would be consistent with the rest of this psyop.