Anonymous ID: 2fb547 July 31, 2018, 9:18 p.m. No.2384419   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4440 >>4444 >>4448 >>4457 >>4647 >>4674 >>4684 >>4692 >>4728 >>4730 >>4775 >>4779 >>4820 >>4848 >>4934

## Board Owner

Since the porn policy is still under review? Can we at least require a spoiler? Right after POTUS's tremendous speech tonight, the board got slammed by that junk and it dampens some of our enthusiasm and makes the board look like a bunch of horny teen agers. Isn't enforcing use of the spoiler a nice way to deal with the issue? We're now getting world-wide attention. Don't want the message obscured because some ill disciplined anons refuse to respect the topic.

Anonymous ID: 2fb547 July 31, 2018, 9:21 p.m. No.2384472   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4496

Or you can filter your own self by simply using the spoiler. Then those who want to look can look. The choice to know will be up to the ones clicking on the spoiler. >>2384448

Anonymous ID: 2fb547 July 31, 2018, 9:25 p.m. No.2384550   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4643

But muh freeedom. You people are such hypocrites! Board owner wants to curb your porn posting and you squeal like little girls "muh freedom is being taken away". Someone say one word to you and you want to silence their speech. >>2384521

Anonymous ID: 2fb547 July 31, 2018, 9:38 p.m. No.2384752   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>2384681

Maybe they have a deal with Manafort too. If [RR] is bad so is RM and if they aren't they aren't together. Both [RR] and RM rise or fall together. RM and [RR] have enough on them to get them locked up. But, RM is a Marine, Think logically. Why would Q point out that background?