Welcome to17 / 47 Day
Min 17
Mirror 47
Sauce would be nice.
Russia’s Monster FAB-3000 Glide Bomb Shown Employed By Su-34 Bombers
Published on: July 16, 2024 at 5:10 PM
The RuMoD extensively captured in a video the bomb’s loading, carriage, release, flight and final target engagement in explicit detail.
Almost a month after it released footage of the massive 2,993 kg FAB-3000 bomb strapped with the UMPK (Universal Module for Planning and Correction) glide kit striking a land target in Kharkiv, Russia now officially published a video of the bomb and its launching Su-34 aircraft in action. The RuMoD (Russia Ministry of Defense) extensively captured in a video the bomb’s loading, carriage, release, flight and final target engagement in explicit detail.
moar:
https://theaviationist.com/2024/07/16/russias-monster-fab-3000/
Disinformation is necessary
On this day in History
First Amendment prevails.
1968 US Supreme Court: Epperson v. Arkansas declares unconstitutional the Arkansas law banning the teaching of evolution in public schools
Epperson v. Arkansas (1968) was a landmark Supreme Court case that struck down an Arkansas law prohibiting the teaching of evolution in public schools, ruling it unconstitutional under the First Amendment's Establishment Clause.
Background of the Case
In 1928, Arkansas enacted a law that made it illegal for teachers in public schools to teach the theory of evolution or to use textbooks that included such teachings. This law was a response to the growing influence of fundamentalist religious beliefs that opposed the scientific theory of evolution, particularly in the wake of the Scopes Trial in Tennessee. In 1965, Susan Epperson, a public school teacher in Little Rock, was instructed to use a new biology textbook that contained a chapter on evolution. Fearing prosecution under the Arkansas law, she sought a declaratory judgment to challenge the statute's constitutionality.
Justia
+1
Legal Proceedings
Epperson's case was initially heard in the State Chancery Court, which ruled that the law violated her First Amendment rights to free speech. However, the Arkansas Supreme Court reversed this decision, asserting that the state had the authority to dictate the public school curriculum. Epperson then appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court.
Oyez
+1
Supreme Court Decision
On November 12, 1968, the Supreme Court unanimously ruled in favor of Epperson, declaring the Arkansas law unconstitutional. Justice Abe Fortas, writing for the Court, emphasized that the law was rooted in religious beliefs and thus violated the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment, which prohibits the government from favoring one religion over another or from promoting religious doctrines in public education. The Court held that the state’s right to prescribe the curriculum does not extend to prohibiting the teaching of scientific theories based on religious objections.
Justia
+2
Implications
The ruling in Epperson v. Arkansas set a significant precedent for the separation of church and state in public education. It affirmed that laws prohibiting the teaching of evolution based on religious grounds are unconstitutional. This case laid the groundwork for future legal battles over the teaching of evolution and creationism in schools, including the later case of Edwards v. Aguillard in 1987, which further addressed the issue of teaching creation science alongside evolution.
Oyez
+1
In summary, Epperson v. Arkansas was a pivotal case in the ongoing debate over science and religion in education, reinforcing the principle that public schools must remain neutral in matters of religion.
https://www.bing.com/search?qs=UT&pq=Epperson+v.+Arkansas&sk=CSYN1AS1MT1&sc=8-20&pglt=297&q=epperson+v.+arkansas+1968&cvid=a1c06de966614092a7be9aec2340aa98&gs_lcrp=EgRlZGdlKgYIAhAAGEAyBggAEEUYOTIGCAEQABhAMgYIAhAAGEAyBggDEAAYQDIGCAQQABhAMgYIBRAAGEAyBggGEAAYQNIBCDQ3NTdqMGoxqAIIsAIB&FORM=ANNTA1&PC=SCOOBE
>>23843857
YES.
YES.
>https://www.bing.com/search?qs=UT&pq=Epperson+v.+Arkansas&sk=CSYN1AS1MT1&sc=8-20&pglt=297&q=epperson+v.+arkansas+1968&cvid=a1c06de966614092a7be9aec2340aa98&gs_lcrp=EgRlZGdlKgYIAhAAGEAyBggAEEUYOTIGCAEQABhAMgYIAhAAGEAyBggDEAAYQDIGCAQQABhAMgYIBRAAGEAyBggGEAAYQNIBCDQ3NTdqMGoxqAIIsAIB&FORM=ANNTA1&PC=SCOOBE
Implications
The ruling in Epperson v. Arkansas set a significant precedent for the separation of church and state in public education. It affirmed that laws prohibiting the teaching of evolution based on religious grounds are unconstitutional. This case laid the groundwork for future legal battles over the teaching of evolution and creationism in schools, including the later case of Edwards v. Aguillard in 1987, which further addressed the issue of teaching creation science alongside evolution.
Oyez
+1
In summary, Epperson v. Arkansas was a pivotal case in the ongoing debate over science and religion in education, reinforcing the principle that public schools must remain neutral in matters of religion.
_______
Yes, further cases confirmed that by the Supreme Court.
Schools must follow the Constitution.
Also reaffirms that Law repugnant to the Constitution are null and void. -Marbury v Madison
https://www.oyez.org/cases/1968/7
Can't wait til some of these laws are officially removed nationwide!
Amen Brutha!