>President Newsom
>Kinda has ring to it
Inmate Newsom has a nicer ring to it
>R. GOUVIEA LOOKS AT THE DEMS FAKE HITJOB TO DISTRACT FROM THE SHUTDOWN
More likely to distract from Newsom's chief of staff getting indicted
sorry former chief of staff Dana Williamson
>ongoing investigations into the diversion of campaign funds
Whose campaign funds? Newsom's?
What does Newsom know and what was his involvement?
Oversight Dems Release New Epstein Emails That Mention “Trump” – Instantly Backfires on Them!
On Wednesday morning, the Democrats’ Committee on Oversight released a “tranche of correspondence” from the Epstein Estate, claiming to “strike a blow against the White House’s Epstein cover-up.” The three unrelated emails range in dates from 2011 through 2019.
In response to the release, White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt told FOX News Digital, “The Democrats selectively leaked emails to the liberal media to create a fake narrative to smear President Trump.”
Ranking Member Robert Garcia (D-CA) stated: “The more Donald Trump tries to cover up the Epstein files, the more we uncover. These latest emails and correspondence raise glaring questions about what else the White House is hiding and the nature of the relationship between Epstein and the President.”
Perhaps the “glaring questions” these emails raise revolve around why Giuffre’s name was conveniently redacted and why Michael Wolff is conspiring with a known-pedophile to collect “valuable PR and political currency” or generate “a debt” against a potential President of the United States?
Ranking Member Robert Garcia (D-CA) stated: “The more Donald Trump tries to cover up the Epstein files, the more we uncover. These latest emails and correspondence raise glaring questions about what else the White House is hiding and the nature of the relationship between Epstein and the President.”
Perhaps the “glaring questions” these emails raise revolve around why Giuffre’s name was conveniently redacted and why Michael Wolff is conspiring with a known-pedophile to collect “valuable PR and political currency” or generate “a debt” against a potential President of the United States?
Email 2 and 3: The Wolff
Email #2 released by the Oversight Dems was dated January 31, 2019. Jeffrey Epstein writes author Michael Wolff:
Prior to January, 2019, the references to this claim were sparse. Most of them claim that Trump “kicked him out” or “banned him,” not that he asked him “to resign”. Mar a Lago is a private club, however, not all patrons are members. There is a distinct difference between “banned” and “asked…to resign”.
Email #3 is the most interesting. In a series of correspondence between Epstein and Wolff on December 15, 2015, the day of a GOP Presidential Debate, Wolff tips off Epstein that Trump may be asked “about his relationship with you – either on air or in a scrum afterwards.”
Epstein responds, “if we were able to craft an answer for him, what do you think it should be?”
Wolff had conducted hours upon hours of interviews with Epstein regarding President Trump and other powerful figures. However, this exchange is quite concerning. Wolff suggests potentially using Trump’s denials of being on the plane or in the house as “political currency” and “hanging him in a way” that he could benefit.
He then suggests that if Trump won, he could “save him” and then use that as “a debt”.
Almost a year later, just over a week before the 2016 Presidential Election, Wolff once again emailed Epstein. This time, he mentioned “an opportunity” to “help finish [Trump].” The substance of this opportunity is not known, but once again, an alleged “journalist” and author is colluding with a known-pedophile and sex-offender to derail a potential U.S. President.
Ranking Member Robert Garcia (D-CA) stated: “The more Donald Trump tries to cover up the Epstein files, the more we uncover. These latest emails and correspondence raise glaring questions about what else the White House is hiding and the nature of the relationship between Epstein and the President.”
Perhaps the “glaring questions” these emails raise revolve around why Giuffre’s name was conveniently redacted and why Michael Wolff is conspiring with a known-pedophile to collect “valuable PR and political currency” or generate “a debt” against a potential President of the United States?
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2025/11/oversight-dems-release-new-epstein-emails-that-mention/
Long article, too long to post in full
>What would the Founding Fathers expect the American Citizenry to do in regards to the Deep State?
Not sure but I think it involved pitchforks and torches.