>>23847858

>>23847886

Follow The [FAMILY]

3591

Nov 13, 2019 1:32:54 PM EST

Q !!mG7VJxZNCI ID: 800bc9 No. 7354333

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g1KfU5ifhqE

Follow the family.

Q

3592

Nov 13, 2019 2:04:59 PM EST

Q !!mG7VJxZNCI ID: 3bc28e No. 7354357

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2014/jul/17/company-co-founded-nancy-pelosis-son-charged-secur/?

Follow the family.

Q

3590

Nov 13, 2019 11:54:51 AM EST

Q !!mG7VJxZNCI ID: 800bc9 No. 7354186

https://www.grassley.senate.gov/sites/default/files/constituents/2017-07-20%20CEG%20to%20DOJ%20%28Ukraine%20DNC%20FARA%29.pdf

Read carefully.

Re-read carefully.

Spy_insert [EC] known?

Re-read drops re: Spy_insert.

What do these people have in common?

Pelosi's son

Kerry's son

Romney's son

Biden's son

Hint: Geo location: Ukraine

Hint: Energy

Coincidence?

When [GS] calls, D's always answer.

Nothing can stop what is coming.

Nothing!

Q

>>23847955

55

Morning Sun

Bring some HEAT???

>>23848169

KEk

Thought the same.

Dip>RISE

Why did the #Memo drop a Friday [& before the SB]?

Did this seem strange to you?

Watch the news.

Rothschild estate sale [Black Forest].

STOCK market DIVE [666 - coincidence?].

Soros transfer of wealth.

Dopey FREED.

Marriage for POWER, not LOVE.

Hilton/Roth.

Soros/Clinton.

Etc.

News unlocks MAP.

Think Mirror.

Which team?

THEY don't know.

APACHE.

These people are EVIL.

Still don't believe you are SHEEP to them?

20/20 coming.

PUBLIC is VITAL.

RELEASE of INFO VITAL.

OUTRAGE.

JUSTICE.

Can we simply arrest the opposition w/o first exposing the TRUTH?

FOLLOW THE LIGHT.

Q

>>23848274

Not same as meme, but quick search…

Yesterday?

LANDFALL…

Samsung Mobile Zero-Day Used to Deliver LANDFALL Android Spyware

NOVEMBER 12, 2025|IN SECURITY|BY SECURITY TEAM

In late 2024–2025 security teams discovered a targeted spyware campaign that abused a previously unknown Samsung image-processing vulnerability (tracked as CVE-2025-21042) to install a commercial-grade Android spyware family researchers call LANDFALL on Galaxy devices. Attackers weaponized specially crafted DNG (Digital Negative) image files — often disguised as ordinary WhatsApp images — to trigger an out-of-bounds write in Samsung’s image codec library and achieve remote code execution. The campaign appears targeted (reported primarily in the Middle East) and operated for months before Samsung issued a patch in April 2025.

Attack Description

Imagine receiving a photo through WhatsApp from someone you know — a normal, casual image. Behind the pixels, however, a malicious actor has embedded a crafted DNG file that takes advantage of a flaw in Samsung’s image-handling library. When the image is processed on the device (thumbnail generation, gallery preview, or system image parsing), the vulnerability triggers an out-of-bounds write that lets the attacker execute code inside the context of a privileged system component. That code then drops LANDFALL, which establishes persistent surveillance: recording audio, stealing files, tracking location, harvesting contacts and call logs, and exfiltrating data over covert channels.

Key points:

Delivery vector: crafted DNG image files appearing as WhatsApp images.

Exploited vulnerability: CVE-2025-21042 (image processing / libimagecodec).

Campaign timeline: activity observed since mid-2024; patch released by Samsung in April 2025.

Impact on Systems and Users

Direct impacts

Remote compromise of Samsung Galaxy devices without obvious user interaction (zero-day exploitation during image processing).

Full surveillance capabilities: microphone recording, camera capture, location tracking, file and contact exfiltration, interception/harvest of messages and call logs.

Persistence achieved by installing native components and hooking system services, making removal nontrivial without factory reset or OEM repair.

Indirect harms

Privacy violations for targets (activists, journalists, dissidents, corporate executives) — personal and professional secrets exposed.

Collateral compromise: attackers used widely-used messaging apps as a vector, increasing the chance of spreading to acquaintances and contacts.

Attribution and geopolitical risk: reporting suggests a Middle-East focus and potential links to private mercenary surveillance vendors, which raises regional political/privacy concerns.

Technical Description

This section walks through the vulnerability (CVE), the exploitation chain, and LANDFALL’s technical capabilities — written for security practitioners but explained in human terms.

CVE: CVE-2025-21042 — what, where, why it mattered

Identifier: CVE-2025-21042.

Component: an image-processing library used by Samsung devices — reported in research as libimagecodec.quram.so (the Samsung image codec).

Type of flaw: Out-of-bounds write during parsing of certain DNG (RAW) image features. An attacker can craft an image that, when parsed, writes outside expected memory bounds — enabling memory corruption and arbitrary code execution.

Impact: Remote code execution in a privileged component that processes images; this can be triggered by receiving or opening an image, or by background image processing that happens automatically (thumbnailing, gallery indexing).

Severity / scoring: Published reports give a high severity (example: CVSS ~8.8 reported in coverage), reflecting remote exploitation potential and high impact.

Patch: Samsung released a patch addressing the vulnerability in April 2025. Devices updated after that point should no longer be vulnerable to the original exploit.

moar

https://cybersrcc.com/2025/11/12/samsung-mobile-zero-day-used-to-deliver-landfall-android-spyware/#:~:text=Samsung%20Mobile%20Zero%2DDay%20Used%20to%20Deliver%20LANDFALL%20Android%20Spyware,-November%2012%2C%202025&text=In%20late%202024%E2%80%932025%20security,a%20patch%20in%20April%202025.

An EO, STOPPING THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENTS FINANCIAL INCENTIVES and REVOKING STATE AUTHORITY, BY A CORRUPT SUPREME COURT, TO IGNORE THE 14th AMENDMENT NEED TO HAPPEN NOW!!!

D. CAPTA

As Congress clarified CPS’s role as the states’ main investigator in neglect and abuse cases, the number of investigations conducted nationwide skyrocketed.[195] The number of children separated from their parents and placed in foster care because of those investigations grew in parallel over the same period.The number of children in foster care was 246,500 in 1961.[196] By 1977, the number of children in foster care had jumped to 478,000.[197] With CAPTA firmly in place funding CPS and mandating investigations of every report of neglect and abuse, the newly formed Center on Child Abuse and Neglect promulgated guidelines for the investigations.[198] As is the case today, federal guidelines strongly advised home searches as part of a CPS investigation. Many state statutory schemes would eventually incorporate home searches as a required element of CPS work.[199]

While CPS agents began to conduct their mandated home searches, the federal judiciary began to see its first cases challenging the Fourth Amendment sufficiency of the newly prevailing CPS regime. At the time, as discussed in Parts II.A–II.C above, courts had three main frameworks through which to evaluate the constitutionality of home searches where there was not freely given consent[200] or exigent circumstances:[201] (1) traditional Fourth Amendment probable cause, which would require a warrant particularized to the conduct and place in question; (2) Camara’s diluted probable cause, which would require an area search warrant; and (3) a Wyman-type search, which would require no warrant at all. The emergence of CPS as an investigative body and home searches as their investigations coincided with the Supreme Court’s expansion of the administrative search exception to include yet another warrantless framework for evaluating them—searches pursuant to a diminished expectation of privacy.

As the Supreme Court began developing doctrinal carve-outs to the Fourth Amendment’s warrant requirement before the 1980s,[202] the co-emergence of diminished privacy searches with federal CPS funding confused lower courts’ analysis of CPS investigation cases, which were just beginning to bubble up.[203] The carceral state was expanding and shifting to designate specialized tasks to additional agents under new agencies. CPS agents were now responsible for investigating parental fitness, placing parents on maltreatment registries, filing neglect and abuse cases in juvenile and family court, and removing children from their parents’ care.[204] Courts analyzing this novel state action struggled to decide whether such agents, agencies, and their specialized tasks were subject to newly constructed exceptional Fourth Amendment doctrines or if the traditional constitutional doctrines would apply.[205]

The Supreme Court did not help. In a series of cases postdating Wyman, the Court recognized a distinct Fourth Amendment exception, this time permitting government officials to escape the warrant and probable cause requirements in cases of individuals with a diminished expectation of privacy. Beginning in 1985, the Court approved searches of certain individuals who fit that bill, either based on where the searches took place,[206] like schoolchildren[207] and government employees,[208] or based on the individual’s legal status, like probationers[209] and parolees.[210] Unlike dragnets, this new subset of exceptional searches required a degree of individualized suspicion, but the Court authorized officials to search without a warrant and on the basis of reasonable suspicion rather than probable cause.[211] In the case of searches pursuant to legal status, the departure from the warrant and probable cause requirements were predicated on an ongoing carceral relationship with the state after criminal adjudication.[212] To satisfy the exception, in addition to proving up the group’s reduced expectation of privacy, the Court required that the government articulate a need—as in the dragnets approved in Camara—or departing from the Fourth Amendment’s default warrant and probable cause standard.[213]

Way more

https://www.californialawreview.org/print/family-policing-and-the-fourth-amendment#:~:text=This%20Article%20examines%20how%20CPS,contemporary%20Fourth%20Amendment%20doctrinal%20edifice.

>>23848430

The New York Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children was founded in 1874. It is the world's first child protective agency. It is sometimes called theGerry Societyafter one of its co-founders, Elbridge Thomas Gerry.

Elbridge Thomas Gerry was an American lawyer and reformer. He was the Commodore of the New York Yacht Club from 1886 to 1892. His paternal grandfather was U.S. Vice President Elbridge Gerry.

El[BRIDGE] Gerry

Overcoming his objections to the Constitution, Gerry served in the House of Representatives from 1789 to 1793.To the dismay of his anti-federalist friends, he supported the Federalist agenda, including Hamilton’s proposals to fund the War debt and establish a national bank.

In 1810, Gerry ran again as the Democratic-Republican candidate and was elected governor of Massachusetts. He was re-elected in 1811, but was defeated in 1812. He had become unpopular after supporting a redistricting bill that gained him lasting fame. By rearranging voting districts around Amesbury and Haverhill to favor the Republicans, the resulting district resembled a salamander, thus earning the famous sobriquet of a “gerrymander.” He also prosecuted Federalist editors for libel and appointed family members to state office—both adding to his unpopularity.

https://www.dsdi1776.com/signer/elbridge-gerry/

>>23848646

Trump Orders DOJ to ‘Secure the Release’ of Convicted Election Denier Tina Peters

By Matt Cohen

May 6, 2025

https://www.democracydocket.com/news-alerts/trump-orders-doj-to-secure-the-release-of-convicted-election-denier-tina-peters/

>>23848737

Connected

>>23848620

>>23848430

Endless supply of Children, States Seize, with Permission from a very CORRUPT HIGH COURT, and FEDERAL FUNDING.

But, it's too profitable to shut down.

Perhaps more will become outraged, when they SNATCH a loved one

OUR GOVERNMENT CREATED AND FUNDS CHILD TRAFFICKING

EVERYONE IS CORRUPT, COMPLICIT and GUILTY AT THIS POINT

HIDE THE TRUTH and YOU DENY GOD