Here’s why the buried Henry Ford study on childhood vaccinations is not flawed as claimed

By Rhoda Wilson on November 13, 2025

A 2020 study of 18,400 children found a 250% (2.5-fold) increased risk of developing a chronic health condition in children who receive childhood vaccinations when compared to children who remain unvaccinated.

The study was buried so deep that hardly anyone knew it existed – until it resurfaced at a US Senate hearing in September and became the centre of a debate about vaccine safety.

In September, a study on the impact of childhood vaccination was entered into the record at a hearing of the US Senate’s Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations. The study, which followed the health of 18,400 vaccinated and unvaccinated children, is a damning indictment of childhood vaccination. And it is a study that hardly anyone has seen; they buried it so deep that very few people have found it.

During the hearing, Dr. Jake Scott described the study as flawed, so much so that Senator Richard Blumenthal (D-CT) described it as a study that “no reputable journal would or should ever publish.”

Read more: Unpublished Henry Ford study at centre of vaccine safety debate, Detroit Free Press, 25 September 2025

In the following, Dr. Scott McLachlan goes through the flaws of the study, as claimed by Dr. Scott. “Many of us might agree that it was flawed, but WHY it is flawed is interesting and actually speaks to the issues we raise about how chronically negligent and misguided the pro-vaccine lobby is,” Dr. McLachlan said.

They Tried To Hide It: A Major Childhood Vaccine Study Accidentally Sees the Light of Day

more:

https://expose-news.com/2025/11/13/buried-henry-ford-study-on-childhood-vaccinations/