>>23851909 pb

None of it really makes sense to me, but maybe I am missing something.

If Huma/Weiner had an email client set up on the porno laptop, then it seemingly would have been using either IMAP or POP.

https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/office/what-are-imap-and-pop-ca2c5799-49f9-4079-aefe-ddca85d5b1c9

That fits my recollection of those days,

But it wasn't POP, since that deletes the messages on the server, and Huma was actually using other devices, so that didn't happen.

But IMAP only downloads messages when they are read, which is basically how most email clients (mobile and web) work today.

So they would NOT have been available in some giant hidden stache on the porno laptop.

It is all very suspicious.

>>23851932

>>23851932

>More likely the phones were set up to backup through the cloud, using the sync phone function.

But how did the "cloud" backup of Huma's blackberry then get backed up to the physical porno laptop?

>>23851934

Well, yes, because the whole thing arguably put Trump in office.

I can personally attest that I am not entirely sure if I would have ACTUALLY gone to vote for Trump in 2016 if it were not for my VISCERAL DISGUST with Comey's opening and then miraculously closing the second HRC email inquiry.

I doubt I'm the only one.

>>23851965

>Here's what Grok says:

>There is no evidence that BlackBerry files (messages, backups, or data) were saved to Anthony Weiner’s laptop in any official, technical, or documented way.

GROK IS FAGGIT.

The evidence is right here (link posted pb):

https://x.com/paulsperry_/status/1989186166416175211#m

Comey claims that blackberry domain emails show up with metadata on the Weiner laptop.

That clearly indiciates some sort of automated copying, not simply printing.

Of course, who knows if the email is real or if Comey is lying here or what, but it is EVIDENCE contra the grokbot.