>>23855097 pb
>kvetching about the 6 gorillion almost 30 years before the German guy rose to power.
longer than that
some anon posted a long list of references to 6 gorillion going back to the 19th century
if someone gets me a beer, i'll trundle thru my folder of meme folders to find it
don't forget the Civil Engineers for 9/11 Truth
or the fact that it was impossible to make a cell phone call from a plane in flight back in 2001
>I believed in Santa until I was like 8.
you're giving away your age
the time for that kind of innocence ended long ago
hope you never have kids
the TRUTH you claim to hold so dear is that the cold hard "reality" you BELIEVE in is a delusion
"there are things in heaven and earth not dreamt of in your philosophy, horatio"
allowing children to believe the world is a magical place filled with mystery is probably closer to the truth
than the boring deterministic mechanical universe you impose on them
way to crush the imagination right out of them as soon as possible
when losing a discussion
the preferred tactic is to create a strawman argument to deflect from your indefensible position
nothing like stupidity compounded by stubbornness
what part of this don't you get?
you can be right, but go about expressing it the wrong way
the most precious commodity to a teacher is the students' belief in the teacher's credibility
what you did was an attempt to destroy that credibility
you could phrase your "correction" as a question
and allow the teacher to consider it without humiliating him/her
better yet, you go to the teacher privately between classes and politely ask if they might be mistaken
chances are they will thank you, issue a correction in class the next day, and give you credit for bringing it to their attention
a win for everyone
your was was a lose for everyone
imma guess you're still an arrogant egotistical asshat who NEVER admits when you make a mistake
>I do admit when I make a mistake.
>I do not live by the 3 rules that mundanes such as yourself do.
>1. Will this make me money?
>2. Will this improve my social status or help me fit in?
>3. Will this help get me laid?
great
you can start admitting mistakes right now
MISTAKE ONE
i do not live by any of the "rules" you enumerated above
MISTAKE TWO
you, on the other hand, do
the ad hominem insult "mundane" is an effort at self-aggrandizement, and since you are the only person you respect, that is equivalent to improving your social status
MISTAKE THREE
to suggest there is anything "mundane" about me is an ASS-umption at best, and demonstrates your psychic abilities are as wanting as your humility
>No, Christians.
defining characteristic of fundamentalist "Christians":
the overwhelming constant fear that somewhere, someone is having fun
feel sorry for your kids, if you actually have any
hard to believe you found a female with low enough self-esteem to allow you to impregnate her
if you're super suspicious
buy "junk" US silver coins (pre-1964) with no "collecter" value
most local pawn shops will sell it to you at the spot price for silver, since they get less than spot if they sell to large institutional buyer
>Gotta do it online bc
i can vouch for jmbullion.com
believe sdbullion.com is also trustworthy
both sell "junk" US silver coins
you can check weights and silver content of coins w/ wikipedia
then do the arithmetic to get the current melt value of the coins
just remember precious metal prices are per TROY OUNCE, not avoirdupois (common) ounces
>check the ID's.
yer right
sry
trying to stream clemson/louisville, order petfood online, and shitpost at the same time
long before the term "multitasker" came into common usage
we had a different term back in the day… scatterbrain
>Trump is quickly torching away support from key parts of his base.
>Why Women's Brains Are Better Than Men's At Multitasking
>by Lizette Borelli for Medical Daily:
of COURSE it's written by a wimmings
now for some actual neurobiology…
yvw
>like an effort to make up for a lack in either by overcompensating with words?
meh…
i'm more of an engineer than a theoretician
without the possibility of experimentation to confirm or disprove
speculation as to "why" is moot
bottom line…. wimmings just can't seem to grasp that it's time to STFU - further comms are only destructive