>>2385771
A breitbart article and wikileaks email from 2016 already read by millions of people are sensitive?
Yea, could be. But that's not new either or a huge leap in logic for regular folks to make. Silsby has been dug, for example.
>>2385771
A breitbart article and wikileaks email from 2016 already read by millions of people are sensitive?
Yea, could be. But that's not new either or a huge leap in logic for regular folks to make. Silsby has been dug, for example.